The Key Determinant Factors for Social Sustainability in Traditional Settlement

Authors

  • Najiha Jaffar Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Nor Zalina Harun Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-1483
  • Saiful Arif Abdullah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1944

Keywords:

Social Sustainability, Traditional Settlement, Factor Analysis, Kuala Terengganu

Abstract

Successful traditional settlements refer to a settlement environment that spontaneously built by residents who consider their existing site integrates with excellent social sustainability indicators. This study aims to determine the critical factors of physical character for social sustainability of a traditional settlement with the objective to identify the types of physical characteristics deemed as significant in daily social interaction among the locals. To achieve this, a quantitative method was employed using questionnaire survey distributed to 400 residents in two historic settlements, namely Kampung Pulau Duyong and Kampung Losong located at Kuala Terengganu. Both sites are selected due to good conservation practices observed concerning the physical landscape. The results generated from the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed eleven factors (11) related to social sustainability. Such factors then categorised into six latent factors, which are the preservation of local identity, safety, provision of infrastructure, natural qualities, accessibility, and availability of public spaces. The findings recall the relationship between physical aspects and social sustainability as a step towards improvement in historic site preservation efforts.

Keywords: social sustainability; traditional settlement; factor analysis; Kuala Terengganu

eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2019. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1944

Author Biographies

Najiha Jaffar, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Institute of the Malay World and Civilization

Nor Zalina Harun, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Institute for Environment and Development

References

Ali, M. (2018). Interpreting the Meaning of Housing Quality towards Creating Better Residential Environment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 3(8), 141-148.

Barron, L., & Gauntlett, E. (2002). Stage 1 report-model of social sustainability. Housing and Sustainable Communities’ Indicators Project. Perth, Murdoch University, Western Australia.

Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2006, April). What is ‘social sustainability’, and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it. In Sustainable Communities and Green Futures’ Conference, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London.

Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 243-256.

Colantonio, A. (2008). Traditional and emerging prospects in social sustainability: 2008/02.

Dave, S. (2011). Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable Development, 19(3), 189-205.

Davidson, M. (2009). Social sustainability: a potential for politics?. Local Environment, 14(7), 607-619.

Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 68.

Ginting, N., & Rahman, N. V. (2016). Maimoon Palace Heritage District in Medan, Indonesia: What we preserve and why we preserve?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 332-341.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Higher Ed.

Hajirasouli, A., & Kumarasuriyar, A. (2016). The social dimension of sustainability: Towards some definitions and analysis. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, 4(2), 23-34.

Hamdan, H., Khalid, N. S., & Baba, N. F. (2017). People in City: The relation of urban park and the quality of life. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6), 311-318.

Ibrahim, F. I., Omar, D., & Mohamad, N. H. N. (2019). Human Interaction In Urban Open Spaces. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 4(10), 188-193.

Michael, Y. M. A. K., & PEACOCK, C. J. (2011). Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia.

Okunola, O. O., Adebayo, A. K., & Amole, D. (2018). Sense of Community And Demographic Factors As Predictors Of Neighbourhood Satisfaction. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 3(8), 149-156.

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Pitarch-Garrido, M. D. (2018). Social sustainability in metropolitan areas: Accessibility and equity in the case of the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain). Sustainability, 10(2), 371.

Primož, M. (2017). Leading sustainable neighbourhoods in Europe: Exploring the key principles and processes. Urbani izziv, (28 (1)), 107-121.

Surbhi, S. (2016). Difference between probability and non-probability sampling. Retrieved from Key Differences website: http://keydifferences. com/differencs-between-probability-and-non-probabilitysampling. html# KeyDifferences.

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Talmizi, N. M., Zainol, H., Teriman, S., & Ali, N. E. (2017). Improving Community Behaviour Towards Sustainable Mobility for Liveable Neighbourhoods. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6), 45-51.

Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Hadjri, K. (2018). Creative Housing Design: Promoting sustainable living in cohousing community in the UK. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 3(8), 129-140.

Woodcraft, S., Hackett, T., & Caistor-Arendar, L. (2011). Design for social sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. Future Communities.

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Jaffar, N., Harun, N. Z., & Abdullah, S. A. (2019). The Key Determinant Factors for Social Sustainability in Traditional Settlement. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 4(12), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1944

Issue

Section

Community Environment / Social Psychology