Environment and Social Impact Analysis of Riverfront Regeneration: River of Life (RoL), Kuala Lumpur City Hall

t b a


The River of Life (ROL) is a riverfront regeneration project that aims to transform the Klang River into a vibrant waterfront with high economic value. The study aims to define the implications of the RoL towards society in the area of KLCH. One hundred fifty respondents of local and international visitors completed the survey. From the findings, it shows that the respondents reacted favorably to all of RoL's social consequences, but improvements from the aesthetic and awareness is needed. These results help to maximize economic growth, enhancing social interaction and environmental preservation, especially in the urban.


Riverfront regeneration; social impacts; River of Life (RoL)


Brajša-Žganec, A., Merkaš, M., & Šverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being?. Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81-91.

Deng, X., Xu, Y., Han, L., Song., Yang, L., G., & Wang, Y. (2015). Impacts of urbanization on river systems in the Taihu Region, China. Water, 7(4), 1340-1358.

Garau, C., & Pavan, V. (2018). Evaluating urban quality: indicators and assessment tools for smart sustainable cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575.

Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (2002). Research methods for managers. Sage.

Glasson, J., & Wood, G. (2009). Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(4), 283-290.

Jun, K. S., & Kim, J. S. (2011). The four major rivers restoration project: impacts on river flows. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(2), 217-224.

Keles, R., (2012), the Quality of Life of the Environment, Asia Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behavior Studies, Salamis Bay Conti Resort Hotel, Famagusta, North Cyprus.

Krause, C.L., 2001. Our visual landscape – Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landscape Urban Plann, 54: 239-254.

Önen, M. (2007). Examinatıon Rivers’ Recreational Potential As An Urban Coastal Space: Case Study, Eskişehır Porsuk Creek and İstanbul Kurbağalıdere (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science And Technology, 204 p., İstanbul).

Palermo, L. (2014). The role of art in urban gentrification and regeneration: aesthetic, social and economic developments. IL CAPITALE CULTURALE. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, (10), 521-545.

Rabe, N. S., Osman, M. M., Bachok, S., Rosli, N. F., & Abdullah, M. F. (2018). Perceptual study on conventional quality of life indicators. PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL, 16(5).

Rosli, N. F., Rabe, N. S., Osman, M. M., & Abdullah, M. F. (2018). Perception of quality of life among community in Selangor. PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL, 16(6).

Silva, J. B., Saraiva, M. G., Ramos, I. L., & Bernardo, B. (2005). Methodology of aesthetic evaluation of rivers in urban context. In Proceedings of Urban River Rehabilitation Conference, Dresden.

Streimikiene, D. (2015). Environmental indicators for the assessment of quality of life. Intellectual Economics, 9(1), 67-79.

Timur, U. P. (2013). Urban waterfront regenerations. In Advances in landscape architecture. IntechOpen.

Tumbde, D. (2005). Conceptual model for economically viable urban riverfront revitalization in United States (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati).

Wu, J., He, C., Huang, G., & Yu, D. (2013). Urban landscape ecology: Past, present, and future. In Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture (pp. 37-53). Springer, Dordrecht.

Yassin, A. M., & Masrom, M. A. N. (2013). Waterfront Development in Malaysia: Examining Laws and Regulation. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Sustain. Infrastruct. Built Environ. 2013 (SIBE, 2013).

Zhang, L. (2002). An evaluation of an urban riverfront park, Riverfront Park, Spokane, Washington: experiences and lessons for designers.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1854


  • There are currently no refbacks.