Micro Housing: Typological study and implementation in Malaysia

Mohd Fairus Kholid; Puteri Mayang Bahjah Zaharin

doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1934

Authors

Mohd Fairus Kholid UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA MALAYSIA
Puteri Mayang Bahjah Zaharin Universiti Teknologi MARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1934

Keywords:

micro living, adaptable housing typology, regional cultural study, Kuala Lumpur B40 community

Abstract

The micro-housing project introduced by Kuala Lumpur City Council (DBKL) has received cynical rumours amongst the B40 income group due to its impracticality, thus suggesting that micro-housing standard is misinterpreted and simplified. As such, this paper intends to investigate the potentiality of ideal micro-housing that is suitable for the Malaysian context, specifically for the B40 community. Based on a bottom-up approach, this research divides into the micro and macro study. In the micro-study, the focus is specifically on the typological design of micro-housing. Hence this leads to a macro context, which developed the typological analysis in regards to the regional cultural influence. In thoroughly, from seven (7) international precedents, micro-housing can be formulated into four main typologies that include Box, Mobile, Machine, and Props type. These typologies incline towards two (2) cultural domains, namely Possession Domesticity, which demonstrates Westerners influence through technological advancement and Transience Domesticity that portrays Orientalist influenced by the mixture of practicality and human psychology. These attributes tested in three (3) local micro-housing projects that consist of two prototypes by local architect and a built micro-housing project by DBKL. The result shows that both prototypes are potentially ideal. However, DBKLâ€™s built project demonstrated a minimal standard of appropriate micro-housing living. It founds that the lack of axiological human needs may lead to a degradation of values and behaviour. Thus, it significantly recommends that the projects reconsider of adapting the psychological needs for the betterment of its userâ€™s living.

Keywords: micro-living, adaptable housing typology, regional cultural study, psychological needs

eISSN: 2398-4287 Â© 2019. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peerâ€“review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i12.1934

Author Biography

Mohd Fairus Kholid, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA MALAYSIA

Lecturer

References

Daniels.I.M., (2001). The â€˜Untidyâ€™ Japanese House. In Home Possession: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors (pp 202 â€“ 229). New York, NY: Berg

Dober.P, Strannegard.L. (2005). Design, Lifestyle, and Sustainability. Aesthetic Consumption in a World of Abundance. Business Strategy and The Environment. 14, 324 â€“ 336, DOI: 10.1002/bse.495

Foye. C.,(2017). The Relationship Between Size of Living Space and Subjective Well-Being. J Happiness Stud,18:427-461.

Gardiner.S.,(2002). The House â€“ Its Origin and Evolutions. London, UK: Constable & Robinson Ltd

Garvey.P.,(2001). Organized Disorder: Moving Furniture in Norwegian Homes. In Home Possession: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors (pp 47 â€“ 68). New York, NY: Berg

Housing in Malaysia, An Issue of Affordability Not Availability, (2018,). Retrived on September 26 from https://www.edgeprop.my/content/1427870/housing-malaysia-issue-affordability-not-availability

Jacobsen.J.B.,(2013). The Needs of Living. Department of Product Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Lake.R.,(2019). How Millennials are Changing the Housing Market. Retrived on July 3 from https://www.investopedia.com/personal-finance/how-millennials-are-changing-housing-market/

Micro Apartments and Co-Living: The Future of Urban Living, (2018). Retrived September 21 from https://resourcefurniture.com/inspiration/micro-apartments-and-co-living-the-future-of-urban-living/

Microhousing (WUF), (2018). Retrived from http://www.tetawowe.com/mircrohousing-wuf2018.html

Petridou.E., (2001). The Taste of Home. In Home Possession: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors (pp 87 â€“ 104). New York, NY: Berg

Ravenscroft.T. (2019). 10 Micro Homes with Floor Plans That Make The Most of Space. Retrived on March 18 from https://www.dezeen.com/2019/03/18/micro-home-floor-plans-micro-apartment/

Sarip. A.G., Lee.Y.F.,(2015). Exploring The Perception of Lifestyle Housing Development in Malaysia. The Asia Pacific Network for Housing Research (APNHR)

Tan.M.,(2018). The Case For Communal Living. Retrived from https://thinkcity.com.my/the-case-for-communal-living/

Unbuilt Proposal: Micro Housing Within Disused MultyStorey Buildings, (2018). Retrived from https://www.studiobikin.com/ub-micro.php

UNDP, (2016). Support In Developing National B40 Action Plan Using Innovative Bottom Up Approaches. Retrived from

https://www.my.undp.org/content/malaysia/en/home/operations/projects/poverty_reduction/support-in-developing-national-b40-action-plan-using-innovative-.html

Urban Land Institute, (2014). The Macro View on Micro Units. Washington, DC: ULI