Human and Animals Conflicts: A case study of wildlife roadkill in Malaysia

Authors

  • Norhafezah Kasmuri Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Nadirah Nazar Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Abdullah Zawawi Mohd Yazid Department of Wildlife and National Parks (PERHILITAN)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2093

Keywords:

human, road construction, wildlife roadkill, mitigation

Abstract

Conflicts between humans and animals have been a challenge due to rapid urbanization. Most of the forest is cleared to build roads and highway. Thus, animals need to migrate or move for their survival. This paper aims to review wildlife roadkill data from PERHILITAN and arranged it under several groups of species. Here, quantitative analysis of the roadkill data is used to select one species as the primary subject (Malayan Tapir). It has been observed that Malayan Tapir has involved in 68 vehicle collisions with a total loss of RM6.8 million in 5 years. From these results, long-term mitigation measures have been addressed in this study.

Keywords: human; road construction; wildlife roadkill; mitigation

eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2020. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2093

Author Biographies

Norhafezah Kasmuri, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor

Faculty of Civil Engineering

Nadirah Nazar, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor

Faculty of Civil Engineering

References

Ahmad Zafir, A.W., & Magintan, D. (2016). Historical review of human-elephant conflict in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Wildlife and Parks, 31, 1-19.

Australian Government. (2010). Ecosystem Services: Key Concept and Applications. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/b53e6002-4ea7-4108-acc8-40fff488bab7/files/ecosystem-services.pdf.

Brown, V. (2017). Traffic: Malaysia is a key point in the illegal wildlife trade. Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/04/11/malaysia-key-transit-point-for-wildlife-trade/

Coffin A.W. (2007). From roadkill to road ecology: A review of the ecological effects of roads. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 396-406.

DURA Technology Sdn Bhd. (2014). Dura Viaduct to Free the Elephants from Accidents. Retrieved from http://dura.com.my/completed-projects/2015-project/151-dura-viaduct-to-free-the-elephants-from-collions.

Fayle, T. T. (2015). Whole – ecosystem experimental manipulations of tropical forests. Trend in Ecology and Evolution, 30(6), 334-346.

Ford, A. C. (2010). Comparison of Methods of Monitoring Wildlife Crossing‐Structures on Highways. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73(7), 1213-1222.

Government of Malaysia. (2010). Laws of Malaysia, Wildlife Conservation 2010, Act 716.

Huijser, M. D. (2009). Cost-Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: A Decision Support Tool. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1-15.

Jacobson, S. B. K. (2016). A behavior-based framework for assessing barrier effects to wildlife from vehicle traffic volume. Ecosphere, 7(4), 1-15.

JKR. (2015). Project Summary, Central Spine Road, Package 3, Gua Musang Kelantan to Kampung Relong, Pahang, 3F1, 3F2, 3G, 3H. Kampung Kubang Rusa to Kampung Kechur.

Kamarul Zaman, K. (2013). Jambatan Tanpa Sungai (Bridge without a river).

Magintan, D. I. (2015). A Preliminary Observation of Mammals and Other Species Visiting Artificial Salt Licks In Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Wildlife and Parks, 30, 59-74.

PERHILITAN. (2016). Wildlife Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.wildlife.gov.my/images/document/penerbitan/laporantahunan/LP2016%20-%2020022018.pdf

PERHILITAN. (2018). Standard Asset Value of Life version June 5.

Pradhan, P. C. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth's Future, 5(11), 1169-1179.

Rytwinski, T. V. (2015). Experimental study designs to improve the evaluation of road mitigation measures for wildlife. Journal of Environmental Management, 154, 48-64.

Sodhi, N. K. (2010). Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Biological Conservation, 143(10), 2375-2384.

Trombulak, S., & Frissell, C. (2000). Review of Ecological Effects of Road on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities. Retrieved from https://defenders.org/sites/default/files/publications/getting_up_to_speed_natural_environment.pdf.

UNDP. (2013). Improving Connectivity in the Central Forest Spine (CFS) Landscape - IC-CFS Project Document. United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Malaysia, Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Van der Grift, E. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 425-448.

WWF. (2018). Malayan Tiger and Malayan Tapir. Retrieved from https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/malayan-tiger.

Published

2020-03-24

How to Cite

Kasmuri, N., Nazar, N., & Mohd Yazid, A. Z. (2020). Human and Animals Conflicts: A case study of wildlife roadkill in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(13), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2093

Issue

Section

Travel / Transportation Environment