Integrating the Typographic Landscape in Creating Interactive Spaces for a Holistic Learning Environment

Authors

  • Norita Abdul Kadir Centre of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying , Universiti Teknologi MARA (Perak Branch) Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Norhafizah Abdul Rahman Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying , Universiti Teknologi MARA (Perak Branch) Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nur Hisham Ibrahim Department of Graphic Design and Digital Media, Faculty of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Perak Branch), Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2107

Keywords:

Typographic landscape, learning environment, campus environment, interactive space

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the importance of the ideas on integrating Typographic Landscape in a campus environment. In creating interactive spaces that can create a holistic learning environment, an artistic approach has been developed. The design proposed is an installation of functional three-dimensional gigantic letters that will become a bench for students’ informal outdoor activities as part of sustainable initiatives that will beneficial to students in order to give adequate space for a learning environment. A quantitative method using questionnaires survey has been distributed to 160 students. The results of this study will provide a better understanding of the relationships between students' preference and landscape features and aim to enhance the quality of life in a campus environment.

Keywords: Typographic landscape; learning environment; campus environment; interactive space

eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2020. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2107

References

Abu-Ghazzeh, T. (1999). Communicating behavioural research to campus design, factors affecting perception and use of outdoor spaces at the University of Jordan. Environment and Behavior, 31(6), 764-‐804.

Ali, S., Rostam, K., Awang, A. 2014. School Landscape Environments in Assisting the Learning Process and in Appreciating the Natural Environment. Asean – Turkey ASLI. International Conference on Quality Life,AiQoL. 189-198.

Buch, M., Divringi, E., McCann, M., Millard, M. & Patten, J. (2011). Greening Campus Landscapes. Report: Environment. 139. Ann Arbor, M: The University of Michigan.

Burke, A. (2014). Language, Typography, and Place-Making: Walking the Irish and Ulster-Scots Linguistic Landscape. Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, 38.

Christian, NC., 1985, The Concept of Dwelling, Electa/Rizzoli, New York.

Cubukcu, E. & Niyazoğlu Işıtan, Z. (2011).”Does student’s behaviour differ in relation to perception / Evaluation of campus environments? A Post-occupancy Research in Two University Campuses”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 24, 3, 547-558.

Dober, RP 2000, Campus Landscape: Functions, Forms, Features, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

Huerta, R. (2005) Apaga-la! València: Institució Alfons el Magnànim Huerta

Ghani, I., Rahman, N. A., Nayan, N. M., & Bahaluddin, A. (2018). Experiential Virtual Urban Environments: A Preliminary Investigation. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16(5).

Griffith, J. C. (1994). Open space preservation: An imperative for quality campus environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 645-669.

J. Zhao, (2013), Woody Plant Richness and Landscape Preference. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013.

Kane, J. (2002). A Type Primer. City: Press.

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference a comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and behavior, 21(5), 509-530.

Lougee, C. C., Boyer, E. L., & Horowitz, H. L. (1988). College: The Undergraduate Experience in America.

Maheran, Y., Fadzidah, A., Fadhilah, R. N., & Farha, S. (2017, December). A Review of Criteria for Outdoor Classroom in Selected Tertiary Educational Institutions in Kuala Lumpur. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 291, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing.

Modell HI1, DeMiero FG, Rose L. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):37-45.doi:10.1152/advan.90149.2008

Payne, Sarah, 2009. Open space: people space. J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (4), 532–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.007

Shelly, E. (2014). Landscape and Longevity: Pursuing Integrated Aesthetics and Function at Multiple Scales in New Orleans. Landscape Research Record (No.2/2014), 19-29.

Speake, J., Edmondson, S., & Nawaz, H. (2013). Everyday Encounters With Nature: Students' Perceptions And Use Of University Campus Green Spaces. Human Geographies, 7(1), 21.

Spiekermann, E. and Ginger, E.M. (1993) Stop Stealing Sheep and Find Out How Type Works, Press Mountain View California

Stockl, Hartmut. 2005. “Typography: Body and Dress of a Text—A Signing Mode between Language and Image.” Visual Communication 4 (2): 204–14.

Published

2020-03-24

How to Cite

Abdul Kadir, N., Abdul Rahman, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2020). Integrating the Typographic Landscape in Creating Interactive Spaces for a Holistic Learning Environment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(13), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2107