Interdependencies related to Attention Restoration for Mental fatigue: A scoping review

Nacherree Kanthong; Heng Zhang

doi:10.21834/ebpj.v8i23.4389

Authors

Nacherree Kanthong National Cheng Kung University
Heng Zhang Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i23.4389

Keywords:

Behavior Setting, Interdependence, Mental Fatigue, Attention Restoration

Abstract

This paper investigates and gathers data on the causal constraint rehabilitation of mental fatigue linked with attention restoration (ART) components that correlate with the scale of perceived setting interdependencies (PSI) to identify the relationship between the component of ART and the scale of PSI that affect mental fatigue recovery by using scoping review, searching keywords from international literature from 1979 to 2022 in a relevant database and snowballing method in the references list to get a recent paper that is related. Relationships were conceptualized using perceived setting interdependencies (PSI) indicators that identified the relationship between attention restoration and mental fatigue.

References

Barker, R. G. (1968). ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. (Stanford University Press.)

Barker, R. G. (1978). Habitats, environments, and human behavior. In (1st ed. ed.). San Francisco :: Jossey-Bass.

Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., Kaplan, S., Sherdell, L., Gotlib, I. H., & Jonides, J. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J Affect Disord, 140(3), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012

Duvall, J. (2011). Enhancing the benefits of outdoor walking with cognitive engagement strategies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.003

Gatersleben, B., & Andrews, M. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative-the role of prospect and refuge. Health Place, 20, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001

Gerpott, F. H., Balliet, D., Columbus, S., Molho, C., & de Vries, R. E. (2018). How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence. J Pers Soc Psychol, 115(4), 716-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000166

Guéguen, N., & Stefan, J. (2016). “Green Altruism”:Short Immersion in Natural Green Environments and Helping Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 324-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514536576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514536576

Hansmann, R., Hug, S.-M., & Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004

Hartig, T., Catalano, R., & Ong, M. (2007). Cold summer weather, constrained restoration, and the use of antidepressants in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.02.002

Hartig, T., Kylin, C., & Johansson, G. (2007). The Telework Tradeoff: Stress Mitigation vs. Constrained Restoration. Applied Psychology, 56(2), 231-253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00252.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00252.x

Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001

Ibrahim, F. I., Omar, D., & Nik Mohamad, N. H. (2019). Human Interaction In Urban Open Spaces. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 4(10), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i10.1590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i10.1590

Kaplan, R. (2001). The Nature of the View from Home:Psychological Benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115

Kaplan, R. S.-W., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective.

Kaplan, R. S.-W., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (1998). With people in mind : design and management of everyday nature.

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

Kaplan, S., & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784

Kuhn, M. H. (1951). LEWIN, KURT. Field Theory of Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright.) Pp. xx, 346. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951. $5.00. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 276(1), 146-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625127600135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625127600135

Lin, Y.-H., Tsai, C.-C., Sullivan, W. C., Chang, P.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2014). Does awareness affect the restorative function and perception of street trees? [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00906

Macaulay, R., Lee, K., Johnson, K., & Williams, K. (2022). Mindful engagement, psychological restoration, and connection with nature in constrained nature experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104263

Majnouni-Toutakhane, A. (2018). influencing factors on performance of social behavior settings at parks and green spaces of tabriz abstract. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 10, 199-215. https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2018.10.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2018.10.2.4

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Grandpierre, Z. (2019). Mindfulness in Nature Enhances Connectedness and Mood. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0061

Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225-235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003

Popov, L., & Chompalov, I. (2012). Crossing Over: The Interdisciplinary Meaning of Behavior Setting Theory.

Rapuano, M., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G., Masullo, M., Maffei, L., Galderisi, A., Palmieri, A., & Iachini, T. (2022). Spaces for relaxing, spaces for recharging: How parks affect people's emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101809

Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings: A revision and extension of Roger G. Barker's ecological psychology. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503623149

Taylor, L., Leckey, E. H., & Hochuli, D. F. (2020). Focus groups identify optimum urban nature in four Australian and New Zealand cities. Urban Ecosystems, 23(1), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00910-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00910-5

Van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173-181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012

Van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: effects on perseveration and planning. Acta psychologica, 113(1), 45-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00150-6

von Lindern, E. (2015). Setting-dependent constraints on human restoration while visiting a wilderness park. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 10, 29-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.001

von Lindern, E. (2017). Perceived interdependencies between settings as constraints for self-reported restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 8-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.004

von Lindern, E., Bauer, N., Frick, J., Hunziker, M., & Hartig, T. (2013). Occupational engagement as a constraint on restoration during leisure time in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 90-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.001

von Lindern, E., Lymeus, F., & Hartig, T. (2017). The Restorative Environment: A Complementary Concept for Salutogenesis Studies. In M. B. Mittelmark, S. Sagy, M. Eriksson, G. F. Bauer, J. M. Pelikan, B. Lindström, & G. A. Espnes (Eds.), The Handbook of Salutogenesis (pp. 181-195). Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_19

Wicker, A. W. (1992). Making sense of environments. In Person–environment psychology: Models and perspectives. (pp. 157-192). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.