Systematic Literature Review on Robo-Advisery Adoption towards Young People


  • Suhaily Maizan Abdul Manaf Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Md Khairu Amin Ismail Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Malaysia
  • Shahsuzan Zakaria Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Malaysia



Robo-advisory , SLR, Adoption


In the past two decades, numerous studies have focused on robo-advisers in financial technology. Robo-advisers involve automated financial advice for investors, tailoring portfolios based on risk tolerance and objectives, and automatic portfolio-monitoring and rebalancing. While robo-advisers have seen progress in adoption, there are still untapped potentials. This abstract presents a systematic literature review summarising the current state-of-the-art in robo-advisery adoption. By following a detailed, systematic literature-review methodology, the review provides valuable insights for practitioners, potential investors, and researchers seeking to identify areas for further investigation in robo-advisery adoption.


Au, C.-D., Klingenberger, L., Svoboda, M., & Frère, E. (2021). Business Model of Sustainable Robo-advisors: Empirical Insights for Practical Implementation. Sustainability, 13(23), 1–12. DOI:

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: Understanding Robo-advisors Adoption Among Customers. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(7), 1411–1430. DOI:

Chandani, A., Sriharshitha, S., Bhatia, A., Atiq, R., & Mehta, M. (2021). Robo-advisory Services in India: A Study to Analyse Awareness and Perception of Millennials. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, 11(4), 152–173. DOI:

Cheng, Y. M. (2021). Will Robo-advisors Continue? Roles of Task-Technology Fit, Network Externalities, Gratifications and Flow Experience in Facilitating Continuance Intention. Kybernetes, 50(6), 1751–1783. DOI:

Downes, M. J., Brennan, M. L., Williams, H. C., & Dean, R. S. (2016). Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool to Assess the Quality of Cross-sectional Studies (AXIS). BMJ Open, 6(12), 1–8. DOI:

Fan, L., & Chatterjee, S. (2020). The utilization of robo-advisors by individual investors: An Analysis Using Diffusion of Innovation and Information Search Frameworks. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 31(1), 130–145. DOI:

Figà-Talamanca, G., Tanzi, P. M., & D’Urzo, E. (2022). Robo-advisor Acceptance: Do Gender and Generation Matter? PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–13. DOI:

Flavián, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D., & Casaló, L. V. (2022). Intention to Use Analytical Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Services-The Effect of Technology Readiness and Awareness. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 293–320. DOI:

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which Academic Search Systems Are Suitable for Systematic Reviews or Meta‐analyses? Evaluating Retrieval Qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 Other Resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 181–217. DOI:

Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro Forma, Flow-diagram and Descriptive Summary of the Plan and Conduct of Environmental Systematic Reviews and Systematic Maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 1–28. DOI:

Isaia, E., & Oggero, N. (2022). The Potential Use of Robo-advisors among the Young Generation: Evidence from Italy. Finance Research Letters, 48, 103046. DOI:

Jain, N., & Raman, T. V. (2022). The Interplay of Perceived Risk, Perceived Benefit and Generation Cohort in Digital Finance Adoption. EuroMed Journal of Business. DOI:

Kumari, A., & Devi, N. C. (2022). Blockchain Technology Acceptance by Investment Professionals: A Decomposed TPB Model. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. DOI:

Okoli, C. (2015). A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43), 879–910. DOI:

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI:

Samsuddin, S. F., Shaffril, H. A. M., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho, to the Rural Libraries We Go! A Systematic Literature Review. Library and Information Science Research, 42(1), 100997. DOI:

Sani, I. A., & Koesrindartoto, D. P. (2019). The Empirical Study Towards the Acceptance of Robo-advisory for Digital Wealth Advisor: An Indonesian University Student Perspective. The 4th ICMEM 2019 and The 11th IICIES 2019, 112–117.

Seiler, V., & Fanenbruck, K. M. (2021). Acceptance of Digital Investment Solutions: The Case of Robo Advisory in Germany. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101490. DOI:

Shaffril, H. A. M., Samah, A. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Ali, Z. (2019). Mirror-mirror on the Wall, What Climate Change Adaptation Strategies are Practiced by the Asian’s Fishermen of All? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 104–117. DOI:

Shanmuganathan, M. (2020). Behavioural Finance in an Era of Artificial Intelligence: Longitudinal Case Study of Robo-advisors in Investment Decisions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100297. DOI:

Yeh, H.-C., Yu, M.-C., Liu, C.-H., & Huang, C.-I. (2022). Robo-advisor Based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. DOI:




How to Cite

Abdul Manaf, S. M., Ismail, M. K. A., & Zakaria, S. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Robo-Advisery Adoption towards Young People. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI15), 3–9.