Assessing Gender Differences in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among EFL High School Teachers in Inner Mongolia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5648Keywords:
TPACK, Gender Differences, EFL High School Teachers, Inclusive SupportAbstract
This study examines gender differences in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among 437 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) high school teachers in Inner Mongolia, China. Quantitative data revealed significant TPACK disparities between male and female teachers, with males exhibiting higher levels. The findings suggest that male teachers demonstrate greater confidence in integrating technology into their English classrooms. To address the TPACK gender gap, it is recommended that female EFL teachers receive specialized training through mentorship programs, online communities, and workshops. Policy changes are urged to create a collaborative, supportive, and inclusive digital environment for effective technology integration.
References
Abubakir, H., & Alshaboul, Y. (2023). Unravelling EFL teachers' mastery of TPACK: Technological pedagogical and content knowledge in writing classes. Heliyon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17348
Aesaert, K., & Van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017
Alharbi, A. A. M. (2020). The Degree of Teaching Knowledge for Saudi EFL Teachers: An Investigation for Madinah EFL Teachers' Perceptions Regarding TPACK Framework. English Language Teaching, 13(10), 99-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n10p99
Basavaraja, M. T., & Sampath Kumar, B. T. (2017). Gender disparities in the use of ICT: A survey of students in urban schools. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 5(4), 39-48.
Cahyani, L. A., Azizah, N., & Evans, D. (2021). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of special education teachers in science instruction for students with special needs. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.8580
Cahyono, B. Y., Kurnianti, O. D., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2016). Indonesian EFL teachers’ application of TPACK in in-service education teaching practices. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(5), 16-30.
Guppy, N., Boud, D., Heap, T., Verpoorten, D., Matzat, U., Tai, J., ... & Bartolic, S. (2022). Teaching and learning under COVID-19 public health edicts: The role of household lockdowns and prior technology usage. Higher Education, 84(3), 487-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00781-w
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research on technology in education, 41(4), 393-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
Irwanto, I., Redhana, I. W., & Wahono, B. (2022). Examining perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A perspective from Indonesian pre-service teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 142-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32366
Maheshwari, S., Gupta, P. K., Sinha, R., & Rawat, P. (2020). Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Acute Disease, 9(3), 100-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.283886
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1632010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010
Nordin, H., Davis, N., & Ariffin, T. F. T. (2013). A case study of secondary pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge mastery level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.300
Purwati, O. (2022). In-service EFL teachers’ sociocultural-based TPACK beliefs and practices: Voice of teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 278-293.
Rahiem, M. (2020). Technological barriers and challenges in the use of ICT during the COVID-19 emergency remote learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082248
Rainey, C., Villikudathil, A. T., McConnell, J., Hughes, C., Bond, R., & McFadden, S. (2023). An experimental machine learning study investigating the decision-making process of students and qualified radiographers when interpreting radiographic images. PLOS Digital Health, 2(10), e0000229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Sinaga, R. F. (2014). Analisis faktor dominan yang mempengaruhi pemilihan-pemilihan sekolah swasta untuk tingkat SMA di Kota Medan. Universitas Huria Kristen Batak Protestan Nommensen. Laporan Penelitian.
Surayya, S. A., & Asrobi, M. (2020). Tracing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) on Practical EFL Teachers in Writing Context. VELES (Voices of English Language Education Society), 4(2), 177-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v4i2.2417
Surayya, S. A., Asrobi, M., & Farizi, Z. (2021). Scrutiny on Indonesian EFL teachers’ willingness to understand and implement the TPACK in VLE. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 645-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.40986
Tømte, C. (2010). Challenging our views on ICT, gender and education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(special_issue), 309-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-special_issue-04
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jinyao Li, Aruna Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yuping Cao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.