Interiority Study: Quality of interior rental flats desired by low-income communities in urban areas

Authors

  • Muhamad Sholahuddin Interior Design Department, Faculty of Visual Art ISI Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI23.6171

Keywords:

Interiority, Interior, Quality , Flats

Abstract

Objective: to identify what Interiority looks like and the interior quality (flexibility and adaptability) of rental flats, and to find out the residents' actions to overcome it. Method: descriptive qualitative to understand social reality. Results: Interiority: The concept of interior flexibility is that there is no change in vertical partitions, horizontal planes, and levels, and the flexibility of furniture in type and use is flexible. Adaptation concept: spatial adaptation, communal space, privacy space, condition, and aesthetics. Conclusion: Interiority and interior Quality in the interior of flats can be used to create vertical housing that is efficient, affordable, safe, and supports communal living.

References

Brand Steward. (1994). How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built? New York: Penguin Group.

Carmona, Heath, Oc, Tiesdell. (2003). Public Places: Urban Spaces, The Dimension of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Cresswell. (2008). Research Design. (A. Fawaid, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Ching, F. D. K. (1996). Ilustrasi Desain Interior. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ching, F.D.K. (2002). Arsitektur: Bentuk, Ruang dan Tatanan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Coleman, Cindy. (2000). Interior design handbook of professional practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Emamgholi, E. (2011). Flexible Spaces in Architecture.Sastechjournal, 1-8

Groák, Steven. (1992). The idea of building: thought and action in the design and production of buildings. London: E & FN Spon.

H. Estaji. (2017). “A Review of Flexibility and Adaptability in Housing Design”, International Journal of Contemporary Architecture”The New ARCH“Vol. 4, No. 2 (2017) University of Applied Arts Vienna, Austria.

Ionescu, Vlad. (2018). The Interior as interiority. Palgrave Communications. Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0088-6 | www.nature.com/palcomms DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0088-6

Kronenburg, Robert. (2007). Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change. London: Laurence King Publishers.

Lang, Jon. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Lawi (2018), Lawi, Gloria Fransisca Katharina. (2018). Ini 10 Masalah Rumah Susun Versi Pemerintah, Apa Saja? Internet:

https://m.bisnis.com/amp/read/20181002/49/844640/ini-10-masalah-rumah-susun-versi-pemerintah-apa-saja [02 Okt 2018].

Magdziak, Monika. (2019). Flexibility and Adaptability of the Living Space to the Changing Needs of Residents. Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, ul. Oskara Sosnowskiego. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bialystok, Poland: IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/7/072011

Toekio. (2000). Dimensi Ruang dan Waktu. Bandung: Intermatra.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Sholahuddin, M. (2024). Interiority Study: Quality of interior rental flats desired by low-income communities in urban areas. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI23), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI23.6171