From Silence to Spotlight: Energizing classrooms with parliamentary debates

Authors

  • Marfunizah Ma’dan Public Management Department, School of Government, College of Law, Government, & International Studies, 06010, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Nor Suzylah Sohaimi Planning and Property Development Department, School of Government, College of Law, Government, & International Studies, 06010, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Azlydia Johar Faculty of Management and Information Technology, Sultan Azlan Shah University (USAS), Bukit Chandan, 33000 Kuala Kangsar Royal City, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI24.6373

Keywords:

Classroom activities, Parliamentary Debates, Student Engagement, Student Participation

Abstract

In the evolving technological era, traditional teaching methods often limit student engagement and comprehension. Educators face challenges like declining attention and participation in teacher-centered classrooms. This study examines mini-parliamentary debates to boost engagement and comprehension among students. Using open-ended questionnaires and Padlet reflections, it gathers student perspectives and course experiences. Findings show that debates significantly enhance learning outcomes, increasing participation and motivation. Students value this approach, which fosters critical thinking and active involvement. The study emphasizes the need for continuous pedagogical refinement to address evolving educational challenges and improve teaching effectiveness.

References

Feldman, R. S., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2023). Understanding student behavior: Insights into academic performance. New York: Academic Press.

Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Gillies, R. M. (2003). The behaviours, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.137

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025

Heywood, A. (2008). Politics. London: Red Globe Press.

Nhac, T. H. (2023). Enhancing Legal English Skills for Law Students through Simulation-based Activities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 533–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.29

OECD. (2023). The state of higher education: Adapting to the digital age. OECD.org.

Oros, A. L. (2007). Let's debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(3), 293–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160701558273

Palczewski, C. H., & Rowland, R. C. (2007). Using parliamentary debate as a tool to develop critical thinking in undergraduate students. Communication Education.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press.

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. WorldEconomicForum.org.

Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2015). Students' perceptions toward using classroom debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science, 11(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p158

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

Ma’dan, M., Sohaimi, N. S., & Johar, A. (2025). From Silence to Spotlight: Energizing classrooms with parliamentary debates. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI24), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI24.6373