Revolutionizing Science Education: A bibliometric exploration of the flipped classroom model

Authors

  • Nurashikin Muzafar School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
  • Nur Jahan Ahmad School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI32.7054

Keywords:

flipped classroom, science education, technology, engagement

Abstract

The flipped classroom model has emerged as a revolutionary pedagogical technique in science education. To map the research landscape, this study uses VOSviewer and Scopus Analyser to perform a bibliometric analysis of 798 publications from the Scopus database. Key study areas include learning outcomes, technology integration, as well student engagement, specifically in higher education. The findings show a notable increase in interest and publications over the last ten years. This study emphasises how scientific education is being reshaped by the flipped classroom and urges more empirical research to address underexplored areas and expand its applications.

References

Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615

Alves, J. L., Borges, I. B., & De Nadae, J. (2021). Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestao e Producao, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0

Assyakur, D. S., & Rosa, E. M. (2022). Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v7i2.914

Doğan, Y., Batdı, V., & Yaşar, M. (2021). Effectiveness of flipped classroom practices in teaching of science: a mixed research synthesis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41, 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909553

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

Nkanyani, T. E., Mudau, A. V, & Sikhosana, L. (2024). Teaching and learning of physical sciences grade 11 in rural schools through rural blended learning strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14295

Rincon-Flores, E. G., Castano, L., Guerrero Solis, S. L., Olmos Lopez, O., Rodríguez Hernández, C. F., Castillo Lara, L. A., & Aldape Valdés, L. P. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00314-9

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4

Suwardika, G., Sopandi, A. T., Indrawan, I. P. O., & Masakazu, K. (2024). A flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules to enhance students’ self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills: a conceptual framework and its implementation. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 19(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2023-0115

Tunggyshbay, M., Balta, N., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Flipped classroom strategies and innovative teaching approaches in physics education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13258

Turan, Z. (2023). Evaluating Whether Flipped Classrooms Improve Student Learning in Science Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1983868

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Wu, Y. C. J., & Wu, T. (2017). A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice. In Management Decision (Vol. 55, Issue 7, pp. 1333–1350). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518

Downloads

Published

2025-06-10

How to Cite

Muzafar, N., & Ahmad, N. J. (2025). Revolutionizing Science Education: A bibliometric exploration of the flipped classroom model . Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI32), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI32.7054