Litigation Risk and Key Audit Matters Disclosure:  Moderating role of board characteristics

Minsi Lin

doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v10i33.7303

Authors

Minsi Lin School of Economics and Management, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10i33.7303

Keywords:

Litigation Risk, Key Audit Matters, Board Characteristics

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between litigation risk and the disclosure of Key Audit Matters (KAMs) in China, using data from 14,679 non-financial A-share firms from 2017 to 2023. The results indicate that higher litigation risk leads to increased KAM disclosure. Further analysis reveals that certain board characteristics moderate this relationship, with varying effects across different characteristics: board size strengthens it, the proportion of independent directors weakens it, and CEO duality has no significant effect. These findings confirm that KAMs effectively communicate litigation-related risks and underscore the influence of corporate governance on auditors’ reporting behavior.

References

Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2–3), 411–437.

Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315–342.

Beck, J. D., & Bhagat, S. (1998). Shareholder Litigation: Share Price Movements. News Releases, and Settlement Amounts, 18.

Camacho-Miñano, M.-M., Muñoz-Izquierdo, N., Pincus, M., & Wellmeyer, P. (2024). Are key audit matter disclosures useful in assessing the financial distress level of a client firm? The British Accounting Review, 56(2), 101200.

Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi-Cladera, R., & García-Cestona, M. A. (2009). Board characteristics and audit engagement decisions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 594–608.

Donelson, D. C., Hutzler, C. M., Monsen, B. R., & Yust, C. G. (2024). The effect of securities litigation risk on firm value and disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 41(3), 1785–1818.

Fakhfakh, I., & Jarboui, A. (2022). Board of director’s effectiveness, audit quality and ownership structure: Impact on audit risk-Tunisian evidence. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(3), 468–485.

Feng, Y., Guo, X., & Li, H. (2020). Does the Corporate Governance Status and Its Changes Affect the Auditor’s Major Misstatement Risk Judgment? IEIS2019: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering, 193–209.

Field, L., Lowry, M., & Shu, S. (2005). Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3), 487–507.

He, H., & Shi, W. (2023). Enterprise litigation risk and enterprise performance. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103783.

Jizi, M., & Nehme, R. (2018). Board monitoring and audit fees: The moderating role of CEO/chair dual roles. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(2), 217–243.

Khudhair, D. Z., Al-Zubaidi, F. K. A., & Raji, A. A. (2019). The effect of board characteristics and audit committee characteristics on audit quality. Management Science Letters, 9(2), 271–282.

Krishnan, G., & Visvanathan, G. (2009). Do Auditors Price Audit Committee’s Expertise? The Case of Accounting versus Nonaccounting Financial Experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 30–58.

Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2022). The effect of firm-specific litigation risk on independent director conservatism. Managerial Finance, 48(1), 96–112.

Liu, X., Miao, M., & Liu, R. (2020). Litigation and corporate risk taking: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. International Review of Law and Economics, 61, 105879.

Lu, H., Pan, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Political Connectedness and Court Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Lawsuits. The Journal of Law and Economics, 58(4), 829–861.

Malm, J., & Mobbs, S. (2014). Independent Directors and Corporate Litigation. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Noureldeen, E., Elsayed, M., Elamer, A. A., & Ye, J. (2024). Two-tier board characteristics and expanded audit reporting: Evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 63(1), 195–235.

Pinto, I., & Morais, A. I. (2019). What matters in disclosures of key audit matters: Evidence from Europe. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 30(2), 145–162.

Qin, J., Yang, X., He, Q., & Sun, L. (2021). Litigation risk and cost of capital: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101393.

Singh, H., & Sultana, N. (2011). Board of director characteristics and audit report lag: Australian evidence. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 7(3), 38–51.

Srisuwan, P., Swatdikun, T., Pathak, S., Surbakti, L. P., & Saramolee, A. (2024). Factors Influencing Key Audit Matter Reporting in the Stock Exchange of Thailand: Empirical Evidence from 2016–2020 Data. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 512.

Sun, J., & Liu, G. (2011). Client‑specific litigation risk and audit quality differentiation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(4), 300–316.

Tricker, R. I. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA.

Wu, W., Peng, F., Shan, Y. G., & Zhang, L. (2020). Litigation risk and firm performance: The effect of internal and external corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(4), 210–239.

Xu, J. (2020). The Role of Corporate Political Connections in Commercial Lawsuits: Evidence From Chinese Courts. Comparative Political Studies, 53(14), 2321–2358.

Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., Yang, M., & Liu, T. (2025). Economic policy uncertainty and litigation risk: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 92, 102773.

Zheng, X., & Lei, X. (2025). Corporate litigation and CEO accountability: Evidence from China. Journal of Management and Governance.