Creative Housing Design: Promoting sustainable living in cohousing community in the UK

Jingjing Wang; Yiru Pan; Karim Hadjri

doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v3i8.1358

Authors

Jingjing Wang School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Yiru Pan School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Karim Hadjri School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v3i8.1358

Keywords:

Cohousing, Environmental Sustainability, Social Sustainability, Design process

Abstract

A cohousing community is created and managed by its residents. It is a new collaborative housing concept designed to foster meaningful relationships, closer social bonding and energy efficiency concepts. This paper aims to discuss the key principles, priorities and challenges of cohousing design process through interviews with four cohousing project architects and four members of the design group. Semi-structured interviews were carried out i) to understand residents' thinking and behaviour change through living in the cohousing community, and ii) to establish the environmental and social sustainability in a cohousing setting. The study found that the development procedure of cohousing highly differs from the mainstream housing design. The quality of the design can potentially influence the residents' daily life. The findings will benefit a range of groups. It will be an important reference for cohousing design standards. Also, it could potentially become the legitimate toolkit for cohousing groups.

References

AECB standard. (n.d). Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://www.aecb.net/carbonlite/carbonlite-programme/energy-performance-standards

Allen, C., Milner, J., & Price, D. (2002). Home is where the start is: the housing and urban experiences of visually impaired children. Policy Press.

Berggren, H. M. (2017). Cohousing as Civic Society: Cohousing Involvement and Political Participation in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 57-72.

BRE. (n.d). PassivHaus Standard. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from https://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=2856

Canadian Cohousing Network. (2018). What is cohousing? Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://cohousing.ca/what-is-cohousing/

Council, W. L. B. (2012). Code for Sustainable Homes. Retrieved May 6, 2018, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5976/code_for_sustainable_homes_techguide.pdf

Fekete, J. D., Van Wijk, J. J., Stasko, J. T., & North, C. (2008). The value of information visualization. In Information visualization (pp. 1-18). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Garciano, J. L. (2011). Affordable Cohousing: Challenges and Opportunities for Supportive Relational Networks in Mixed-Income Housing. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 20(2), 169-192.

Gawler, T. O. (2000). Disability Discrimination Act. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.348.3380&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Housing LIN, (2008). The cohousing approach to Lifetime Neighbourhoods. Department of Health. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.housinglin.org.uk/Topics/type/The-Cohousing-Approach-to-Lifetime-Neighbourhoods/

Imrie, R., (2006). Independent lives and the relevance of lifetime homes. Disability & Society. 21(4), 359-374.

Jarvis, H., Scanlon, K., Fernandez Arrigoitia, M., Chatterton, P., Kear, A., O'Reilly, D. G., ... & Stevenson, F. (2016). Cohousing: shared futures.

Kelly, M. (2001). Lifetime home, in: S. Peace & C. Holland (Eds.), Inclusive housing in an ageing society, Bristol, Policy Press, 55-76.

Lietaert, M. (2010). Cohousing's relevance to degrowth theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 576-580.

Lifetime Homes, (2010). Lifetime Homes 16 Design Criteria. Retrieved May 1, 2018, from http://www.lifetimehomes.org.uk/pages/design-criteria.html

Marckmann, B., Gram-Hanssen, K., & Christensen, T. H. (2012). Sustainable living and co-housing: evidence from a case study of eco-villages. Built Environment, 38(3), 413-429.

McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1994). Cohousing. A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves, 2.

Morrison, J. (2013). A future for affordable housing: Can cohousing ne a viable model for delivering affordable housing in the UK? (Master thesis), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Priest, I. (2015). Different kind of living. RIBA Journal, 122(10), 54.

Ruiu, M. L. (2014). Differences between Cohousing and Gated Communities: A Literature Review. Sociological Inquiry, 84(2), 316-335.

Ruiu, M. L. (2016). Participatory processes in designing cohousing communities: the case of the community project. Housing and Society, 43(3), 168-181.

Sargisson, L. (2012). Second-wave cohousing: a modern Utopia?. Utopian Studies, 23(1), 28-56.

Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2016). Qualitative research. Sage.

Sanguinetti, A. (2014). Transformational practices in cohousing: Enhancing residents' connection to community and nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 86-96.

UK Cohousing Network. (2018). Cohousing in the UK. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from http://cohousing.org.uk/cohousing-uk

Wang J., Hadjri, Karim, Morris, D. & Bennett S. (2016) The role of cohousing in social communication and sustainable living environments. Third {OIKONET} Conference, University of Central Lancashire, Vol. 23