Preferences for Doors of Vernacular Structures: The Case Study of Kaleici

Hilmi Ekin Oktay; Hacer Mutlu DanacÄ±; IÅŸÄ±nsu Deniz TÃ¼rk

doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v4i11.1656

Authors

Hilmi Ekin Oktay Landscape Architecture Department, Architecture and Design Faculty, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-4549
Hacer Mutlu DanacÄ± Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Turkey
IÅŸÄ±nsu Deniz TÃ¼rk Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i11.1656

Keywords:

Doors, Vernacular Structures, Kaleici

Abstract

This study aims to find choices and a significant indicator which changes preferences of the doors of traditional Structures. Within the scope of this study, we investigated how the preference of entries, which is a transition interface between the urban space and structures, is affected by determined variables. As a result of the regression analysis, the results showed that the critical variables that are preferred, invite a degree of mystery by the existing literature. However, unlike the research literature, the result shows that complexity is not adversely predictive or useful in liking in the selected case study. It has been found that the preferred doors and entrance interfaces have natural materials, harmonious colors, vernacular architectural features, and common structural elements such as steps and eaves.

Keywords: Doors, Vernacular Structures, Kaleici

eISSN: 2398-4287 Â© 2019. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peerâ€“review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v4i11.1656Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

Â

References

Anonymous 1(2018) https://www.antalya.bel.tr/calismalarimiz/tarihi-ve-kulturel-miras-calismalari/kaleici-koruma-amacli-imar-plani-revizyonu [Accessed in 19.03.2018]

Acar, Ä° (2010). DÃ¼nden BugÃ¼ne Antalya (Cilt 2). T.C. Antalya ValiliÄŸi Ä°l KÃ¼ltÃ¼r ve Turizm MÃ¼dÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄŸÃ¼. Antalya

AkalÄ±n, A., YÄ±ldÄ±rÄ±m, K., Wilson, C., KÄ±lÄ±Ã§oÄŸlu, Ã–., (2009). Architecture and engineering students' evaluations of house faÃ§ades: Preference, complexity, and impressiveness, Journal of Environmental Psychology 29. pp 124â€“132

BektaÅŸ, C., (2004). Halk YapÄ± SanatÄ±ndan Bir Ã–rnek. Antalya. Anadolu Evleri Dizisi 2. BileÅŸim YayÄ±nevi. Ä°stanbul

Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Ends and means of experimental aesthetics. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, pp.303-325.

Bringslimark, T., (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, Pp.422-433

Cauwenberg, J. V. et al. (2014). Physical environmental factors that invite older adults to walk for transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, pp.94-103.

Cimrin, H., (2002). YakÄ±n GeÃ§miÅŸe Yolculuk Bir Zamanlar Antalya : Tarih, GÃ¶zlem ve AnÄ±lar. Antalya Ticaret ve Sanayi OdasÄ±. Antalya

Cimrin, H., (2006). Bir Zamanlar Antalya â€œTarih, GÃ¶zlem ve AnÄ±larâ€ (Cilt 1-2). (3. BaskÄ±) Antalya Ticaret ve Sanayi OdasÄ±. Antalya

Daniel T.C., Vining J. (1983). Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality. In: Altman I., Wohlwill J.F. (eds) Behavior and the Natural Environment. Human Behavior and Environment (Advances in Theory and Research). Vol 6. Springer. Boston, MA

GÃ¼l, M., (2006). â€œAntalya Kent Merkezi KÃ¼ltÃ¼r ve Turizm GeliÅŸim BÃ¶lgesinde Yer Alan Sit AlanlarÄ± ve Bu Alanlarda Antalya BÃ¼yÃ¼kÅŸehir Belediyesince BaÅŸlatÄ±lan Ã‡alÄ±ÅŸmalara Ä°liÅŸkin Genel Bir DeÄŸerlendirme, Planlama. (4). Ä°stanbul. pp.121-145.

Hidayetoglu, M. L., Yildirim, K., Akalin, A. (2012). The effects of color and light on indoor wayfinding and the evaluation of the perceived environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, pp.50-58.

Ikemi, M., (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for residential facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, pp. 167â€“173.

Ä°mamoÄŸlu, Ã‡. (2000). Complexity, Liking, and Familiarity: Architecture and Non-Architecture Turkish Students' Assessments of Vernacular and Modern House Facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 20. pp.5-16.

Ä°nceoÄŸlu, M. ve AytuÄŸ, A. (2009). Kentsel MekÃ¢nda Kalite KavramÄ±, Megaron. 4(3). Ä°stanbul. ss.131-146

Ä°zgi, U. ve Batum Aysel, B. (2003). KapÄ±lar â€“ Hafif BÃ¶lmeler. YEM YayÄ±n. Ä°stanbul. pp.23-35.

Kaplan, S., Kaplan R., and Wendt, J. S. (1972). "Rated Preference and Complexity for Natural and Urban Visual Material," Perception & Psychophysics, 12(4),354-356.

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., (1989). The experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Ulrich's Bookstore. Ann Arbor, Michigan. The USA.

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Brown, T. (1998). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and Behavior. 21. Pp.509-530.

Lang, J., (1988). Symbolic aesthetic in architecture: toward a research agenda, Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. pp.11-26.

Lothian, A., (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4). pp.177â€“198

R. Pals, L. Steg, J. Dontje, F.W. Siero, K.I. Van der Zee, (2014).Physical features, coherence, and positive outcomes of person-environment interactions: A virtual reality study, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 40, Pages 108-116,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.004.

Porteus, J. D., (1996). Environmental Aesthetics, ideas, politics, and planning, Routledge, pp.290, England.

Rapoport, A., (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form Towards a Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Pergamon Press Ltd. Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frankfurt.

Shulz, C. N., (1974). Existence, Space & Architecture. (3rd Edition) Praeger Publishers. New York. Ss .75-78.

Tveit, M. S., Sang, A. O., HÃ¤gerhÃ¤ll, C. M. (2015). BÃ¶lÃ¼m 4: DoÄŸal GÃ¼zellik: GÃ¶rsel Peyzaj DeÄŸerlendirmesi ve Manzara AlgÄ±sÄ±. Steg, L., Van der Berg, E., De Groot, J. M. (Ed.). In:Ã‡evre Psikolojisi . Tanslators: Cicerali, L. K., Cicerali E. E. Nobel YayÄ±nevi, ss 37-46. Ä°stanbul. TÃ¼rkiye.

Uyar, M et(. 2004). Antalya kÃ¼ltÃ¼r envanteri: Merkez, 2003. Antalya ValiliÄŸi Ä°l KÃ¼ltÃ¼r ve Turizm MÃ¼dÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄŸÃ¼. Antalya. ss.12-27.