Dispute Board in Construction Services: A manifestation of the principles of quick, simple, and affordable dispute resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4166Keywords:
Construction Services, Dispute Board, Alternative Dispute ResolutionAbstract
Dispute Board (DB) was formed in the latest Construction Law to resolve construction disputes, however the regulation of DB in the Construction Law is far from adequate in manifesting the principle of quick, simple, and affordable dispute resolution. Few norms have manifested the principle by giving no opportunities to resolve disputes through litigation and regulate period to file an objection towards DB's decisions. However, there are few of criticism: (1) The concept of DB is unclear, (2) no period for the DB to make decisions, (3) the decision of BD can be contested.
References
Abdurrasyid, Priatna. (2002) Arbitrase & Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Suatu Pengantar). Fikahati Aneska bekerjasama dengan BANI.
Adinda, Nurcaweda Riztria. (2019). Dispute Board to Avoid Disputes in Construction Projects. Journal of Technology Issues,6(1), 95-102.
Ariani, Nevey Varida. (2012). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i2.101
Asshiddiqie Jimly. (2011). Perihal Undang-Undang. Rajawali Pers.
Chern, Cyril. (2015).Chern on Dispute Boards Practice and Procedure. Oxon.
Daryono, Adhi M. (2017 May 16). “Selesaikan Sengketa Jasa Konstruksi dengan Arbitrase”. https://mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/105006/selesaikan-sengketa-jasakonstruksi-dengan-arbitrase.html
Hidayat, Felix and Gunawan, Christian. (2013, March). Analisis Karakterisitik Penyelesaian Sengketa pada Proyek Konstruksi di Tingkat Mahkamah Agung [Paper presentation]. Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil 7 (KoNTekS 7), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo, Indonesia.
Ismanto, Hadi and Sawrono Hardjomuljadi. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Dewan Sengketa Dan Arbitrase Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Berdasarkan Kondisi Fidic Kontrak 2017, 10(1), 73-86.
Kolopaking, Anita D.A. (2013). Asas Itikad Baik dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Melalui Arbitrase. PT Alumni.
Kurniawan, Faizal et.al. (2020). The Right To Access Banking Data In A Claim For A Division Of Combined Assets That Is Filed Separately From A Divorce Claim. Yustisia, 9 (1), 46-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.34859
Lature, Karolus E. (2018). Analysis of Construction Dispute Resolution in Indonesia. Indonesian Legislation Journal,15(3), 211-222.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2019). Penelitian Hukum.Kencana.
Muljadi, Sarwono Hardjo. (2020). Use of Dispute Avoidance and Adjudication Boards. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000431
Nasution, Ajarotoni and Simorangkir, Theodrik. (2010). Masalah Hukum Arbitrase Online. BPHN Kemenkumham RI.
Nugraha, Xavier, Risdiana Izzaty, Alya Anira. (2020). Constitutional Review di Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 48/PUU-IX/2011: Dari Negative Legislator Menjadi Positive Legislator. Jurnal RechtIdee, 15 (1). 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i1.5183
Putra, Gio Arjuna and Aryani, Nyoman Mas. (2019).Problematika Pembentukan Ruu Permusikan. Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1).
Sariono, Joko Nur and Wibawanto, Agus Dono. (2006). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Perspektif, 11(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.278
Wibowo, Agung (2019). Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (Daab) Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. [Thesis, Airlangga University]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Samsiati, Faizal Kurniawan, Xavier Nugraha, Julienna Hartono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.