Evidence of Contract Dispute Settlement in Electronic Trials in Indonesia in the Construction of the Ius Constitutum and Ius Constituendum

Authors

  • Faizal Kurniawan Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Erni Agustin Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Xavier Nugraha Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Rahajeng Dzakiyya Ikbar Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Stefania Arshanty Felicia Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4168

Keywords:

Evidence, Contract Dispute Settlement, Electronic Trial

Abstract

Trial mechanism in Indonesia has changed through the enactment of Supreme Court Regulations in 2018 and 2019, including electronic trial and evidence. However, it was problematic because the change was partial. Although Indonesia has started to implement the electronic trial, the legal principle of evidence is using conventional procedural law, including the settlement of contract disputes. This article aims to analyze and find the mechanism of examining the evidence of contract dispute resolution in electronic courts in Indonesia in the ius constitutum and ius constituendum. This article suggests a comprehensive construction ius constituendum of contract dispute settlement evidence in Indonesia electronic trials.

References

Butarbutar, E. N. (2010). Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum di Peradilan Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 22(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16225

Dirgantara, F., Muzakki, A., Waluyo, J. E., & Nugraha, X. (2020). Akibat Hukum Tidak Dilakukannya Pemeriksaan Setempat Dalam Gugatan Dengan Objek Sengketa Tanah : Apakah Ada ? 8(30), 600–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.780

Djatmiko, H. (2019). Implementasi Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Pasca Diundangkannya Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 1(1), 22–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v1i1.28

Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata : Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (2nd ed.) . Sinar Grafika.

Hidayat, K. I., Priyadi, A., & Purwendah, E. K. (2020). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421

Izzati, R.M. & Jaya, N. S. P. (2016). Dampak Yuridis Pemeriksaan Setempat (Gerechtelijke Plaatsopneming) Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Dipandang Dari Aspek Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Perkara Pidana, Law Redorm, 1 (2), 34-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v8i1.12416

Jati, C. N. (2013). Kajian Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Perdata (Studi Perkara Nomor: 19/Pdt.G./2011/Pn.Ska Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Jurnal Verstek, 1 (2), 58-67.

Juanda, H. E. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4 (1), 27 – 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Roy, A. G. (2019). Allocation of Burden of evidence under Article 17 (1) Energy Charter Treaty. Arbitration, 17(3), 263–275.

Rozi, F. (2018). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses. Jurnal Yuridis UNAJA, 1(2), 19–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35141/jyu.v1i2.486

Rudy, D. G., & Mayasari, I. D. A. D. (2021). Keabsahan Alat Bukti Surat Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Persidangan Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 164–1.

Saleh, M. & Mulyadi, L. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya. Alumni.

Soesilo, R. (1985). RIB/HIR dengan Penjelasan. Politeia.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20

How to Cite

Kurniawan, F., Agustin, E., Nugraha, X., Ikbar, R. D., & Felicia, S. A. (2022). Evidence of Contract Dispute Settlement in Electronic Trials in Indonesia in the Construction of the Ius Constitutum and Ius Constituendum. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI11), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4168