Evidence of Contract Dispute Settlement in Electronic Trials in Indonesia in the Construction of the Ius Constitutum and Ius Constituendum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4168Keywords:
Evidence, Contract Dispute Settlement, Electronic TrialAbstract
Trial mechanism in Indonesia has changed through the enactment of Supreme Court Regulations in 2018 and 2019, including electronic trial and evidence. However, it was problematic because the change was partial. Although Indonesia has started to implement the electronic trial, the legal principle of evidence is using conventional procedural law, including the settlement of contract disputes. This article aims to analyze and find the mechanism of examining the evidence of contract dispute resolution in electronic courts in Indonesia in the ius constitutum and ius constituendum. This article suggests a comprehensive construction ius constituendum of contract dispute settlement evidence in Indonesia electronic trials.
References
Butarbutar, E. N. (2010). Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum di Peradilan Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 22(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16225
Dirgantara, F., Muzakki, A., Waluyo, J. E., & Nugraha, X. (2020). Akibat Hukum Tidak Dilakukannya Pemeriksaan Setempat Dalam Gugatan Dengan Objek Sengketa Tanah : Apakah Ada ? 8(30), 600–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.780
Djatmiko, H. (2019). Implementasi Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Pasca Diundangkannya Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 1(1), 22–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v1i1.28
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata : Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (2nd ed.) . Sinar Grafika.
Hidayat, K. I., Priyadi, A., & Purwendah, E. K. (2020). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421
Izzati, R.M. & Jaya, N. S. P. (2016). Dampak Yuridis Pemeriksaan Setempat (Gerechtelijke Plaatsopneming) Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Dipandang Dari Aspek Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Perkara Pidana, Law Redorm, 1 (2), 34-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v8i1.12416
Jati, C. N. (2013). Kajian Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Perdata (Studi Perkara Nomor: 19/Pdt.G./2011/Pn.Ska Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Jurnal Verstek, 1 (2), 58-67.
Juanda, H. E. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4 (1), 27 – 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Roy, A. G. (2019). Allocation of Burden of evidence under Article 17 (1) Energy Charter Treaty. Arbitration, 17(3), 263–275.
Rozi, F. (2018). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses. Jurnal Yuridis UNAJA, 1(2), 19–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35141/jyu.v1i2.486
Rudy, D. G., & Mayasari, I. D. A. D. (2021). Keabsahan Alat Bukti Surat Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Persidangan Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 164–1.
Saleh, M. & Mulyadi, L. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya. Alumni.
Soesilo, R. (1985). RIB/HIR dengan Penjelasan. Politeia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Faizal Kurniawan, Erni Agustin, Xavier Nugraha, Rahajeng Dzakiyya Ikbar, Stefania Arshanty Felicia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.