Student Learning Engagement with Emerging Technologies in the EFL Classroom in China: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i24.4652Keywords:
EFL Students, Learner Engagement, Emerging TechnologiesAbstract
This study investigated learner engagement with emerging technologies as a viable teaching and learning tool. This explorative study was conducted in a public university located in Sichuan Province, China involving 160 sophomore students. Data were collected via a questionnaire consisting of open and close-ended questions. The findings revealed that EFL students frequently used Tencent as the preferred platform for online distance learning. Besides that, the findings demonstrated students' positive perception of learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-content interaction through the support of emerging technologies. Thus, it implies that emerging technologies have the potential to boost a quality learning environment.
References
Amin, F. M., & Zulfitri, Z. (2022). Emergency remote teaching during COVID-19 crisis: An analysis of EFL students’ engagement in Aceh. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2), 46-59.
Brindley, J. E. (2014). Learner support in online distance education: Essential and evolving. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (Eds.), Online distance education. Towards a research agenda (pp. 287-310). AU Press.
Han, J., Geng, X., & Wang, Q. (2021). Sustainable development of university EFL learners’ engagement, satisfaction, and self-efficacy in online learning environments: Chinese experiences. Sustainability, 13(21), 11655.
Hu, X., Sidhu, G. K., & Lu, X. (2022). Exploring Positive Psychology Factors in the Quality of English as A Foreign Language Classroom Life: A Case Study. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(22), 17-22.
Juan, S. (2020). Analysis of Overseas Distance Chinese Character Teaching Model. Modern Society, 21, 174-176.
Kennedy, M., & Dunn, T. J. (2018). Improving the use of technology enhanced learning environments in higher education in the UK: A qualitative visualization of students’ views. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 76-89.
Li, B. (2022). Ready for online? Exploring EFL teachers’ ICT acceptance and ICT literacy during COVID-19 in mainland China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 196-219.
Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24-40.
Li, Y., Kim, M., & Palkar, J. (2022). Using emerging technologies to promote creativity in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100177.
Moore. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Jounal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Is teaching like flying? A total systems view of distance education. In: Taylor & Francis.
Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 154-175.
Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Contribution of learner–instructor interaction to sense of community in graduate online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4).
Sidhu, G. K., Chen, M. K. W., Shamida, A., & Wen, C. S. (2022). Embracing the New Norm in Teaching and Learning via G Suite for Education: A Multidimensional Perspective. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(4), 1062-1075.
Teng, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). The effect of two educational technology tools on student engagement in Chinese EFL courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-15.
Troop, M., White, D., Wilson, K. E., & Zeni, P. (2020). The user experience design for learning (UXDL) framework: the undergraduate student perspective. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3).
Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2022). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 189-203.
Van Batenburg, E. S., Oostdam, R. J., Van Gelderen, A. J., Fukkink, R. G., & De Jong, N. H. (2019). Oral interaction in the EFL classroom: The effects of instructional focus and task type on learner affect. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 308-326.
Wiranota, H., & Wijaya, T. (2021). The international students’ perception towards online learning using the tencent meeting during covid-19 outbreak. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Wood, G. (2022). The Global Market for Management Education. In The Future of Management Education (pp. 13-27). Routledge.
Yanjun, G., Luan, W. S., Md., K. M. N., Nooreen, N., & Jingxin, G. (2022, November 28–December 2). Chinese EFL Teachers’ Reflections of Online English Teaching
during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study The 30th International Conference on Computers in Education(ICCE 2022), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://icce2022.apsce.net/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Min Fan, Gurnam Kaur Sidhu, Melanie Khor, Huaying Jiang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.