Grammar and Technology: A Bibliometric Exploration of Research Trends and Influential Works

Authors

  • Nazatul Paris Faculty of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pahang, Raub, Malaysia
  • Maimanah Samsuri Faculty of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pahang, Raub, Malaysia
  • Hafiza Abas Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5692

Keywords:

Grammar, Technology, Bibliometric

Abstract

The study delves into the pivotal role of Grammar in scholarly communication, emphasising the need for a nuanced understanding of evolving grammatical research. Conducting a bibliometric analysis of 381 papers from the Scopus database (2015-2023), it explores grammar teaching and learning via technology. Employing advanced methods, the research identifies influential authors, institutions, and countries, tracks evolving themes, and assesses funding sources. The study utilises tools like Microsoft Excel, VOS Viewer, and Harzing to unveil partnerships, current research areas, and impact assessment. By categorising five clusters, it sheds light on underexplored research areas, offering insights for future investigations into grammar research.

 

References

Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M. and Ale Ebrahim, N.(2013), “A Comparison Between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Appio, F.P., Cesaroni, F. and Di Minin, A. (2014). "Visualising the Structure and Bridges of the Intellectual Property Management and Strategy Literature: A Document Co-Citation Analysis", Scientometrics, Vol. 101 No. 1, pp. 623-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0

Bikowski, Dawn. (2018). Technology for Teaching Grammar. 1-7. 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009

Crystal, David. (2002). Language and The Internet. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on. 45. 142-144. 10.1109/TPC.2002.1003702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2002.1003702

Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture, and communication online. Oxford University Press.

Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M. and Verona, G. (2010), “Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation Into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 1187-1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027

Dibekulu, Dawit. (2022). Teaching Grammar: In The View of Conventional Vs Contemporary Approach. X.

Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative Models for Managing Supply Chain Risks: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2021). Understanding the Role of Digital Technologies in Education: A Review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Janaki Manokaran, Norizan Abdul Razak, & Afendi Hamat, (2023) Game-based learning in teaching grammar for non-native speakers: a systematic review. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 29 (2). pp. 13-32. ISSN 0128-5157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2902-02

Manning, C. D., & Schutze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press.

Meier, M. (2011), “Knowledge Management in Strategic Alliances: A Review of Empirical Evidence”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00287.x

Tavakoli, M. (2021). Using Google Search for English Grammar Learning. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 6(2), 318-339. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp318-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp318-339

Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2007), “Bibliometric Mapping of the Computational Intelligence Field”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 625-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M. and Zimmermann, E. (2002), “Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology – I: The Multiple uses of Bibliometric Indicators”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083

Wu, Y.C.J. and Wu, T. (2017), “A Decade of Entrepreneurship Education in the Asia Pacific for Future Directions in Theory and Practice”, Management Decision. Vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 1333-1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518

Downloads

Published

2024-02-24

How to Cite

Paris, N., Samsuri, M., & Abas, H. (2024). Grammar and Technology: A Bibliometric Exploration of Research Trends and Influential Works. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(27), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5692

Issue

Section

Communications / Social Media Environment