Proposed Knowledge Transfer Key Factors Model in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Rosle Mohidin Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
  • Roselina Ahmad Saufi Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia
  • Roslinah Mahmud Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5813

Keywords:

Knowledge Transfer, Higher Education Institutions, Knowledge Sharing

Abstract

Knowledge transfer entails not only the transmission of information, but also the transmission of experience, best practises, and learning. This combination, known as tacit knowledge, is well recognised as being extremely difficult to articulate and record, but it is invaluable in adding depth and context to information to provide a richer understanding. As a result, ensuring an effective knowledge transfer process necessitates significant dimensions such as human capital skills and values, knowledge type, knowledge transfer methods, and organisational support. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that influence the implementation of knowledge transfer projects in Malaysian higher education institutions. Based on the comprehensive literature review and pilot study findings, the study identified Higher Institutions of Education (HIE) Capacity, Academia Capability, Graduate Interns Capability, KT Partner Organization, Relational Elements, Technology Augmentation, External Factor, and Knowledge Transfer Mechanism as the primary factors influencing KT project performance. Aside from that, the study suggests that the Knowledge Transfer Mechanism and government policy play a mediating role in the proposed model.

References

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Neely, A. and Salter, A. (2009a). The Search for Talent and Technology: Examining the attitudes of EPSRC industrial collaborators towards universities. London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P. and Salter, A. (2009b). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university industry collaboration. In: Triple Helix VII. 7th biennial International Conference on University, Industry & Government Linkages. Glasgow, UK 17-19 June 2009. Glasgow: Strathclyde University.

Lockett, N. et al. (2009). The Influence of co-location in higher education institutions on small firms’ perspectives of knowledge transfer. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 21(3), 265-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802279973

Nilsen, V., & Anelli, G. (2016). Knowledge transfer at CERN. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 113–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.014

Alaarj, S., Abidin-Mohamed, Z., & Bustamam, U. S. B. A. (2016). Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 729–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.074

Bergeron, B. (2011). Essentials of Knowledge Management. Management (Vol. 30). https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-38

Argote, L.; Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893

Paulin, D., & Suneson, K. (2012). Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Barriers – Three Blurry Terms in KM. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10, 81–91.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. (Vol. 1)

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university - industry - government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations: Introduction. Industry and Higher Education, 12(4), 197–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095042229801200402

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (1997), ‘Introduction: universities in the global knowledge economy’, in Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations, eds. H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, London and Washington, DC: Pinter, pp. 1–8.

Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1–54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440116

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry-university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 17(3–4), 299–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8

Schofield, T. (2013). Critical success factors for knowledge transfer collaborations between university and industry. Journal of Research Administration, 44(2), 38–56.

Galabova, L. &McKie, L. (2013). The five fingers of my hand: human capital and well-being in SMEs. Personnel Review. 42(6), 662-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2012-0017

Duan, Y., Nie, W., & Coakes, E. (2010). Identifying key factors affecting transnational knowledge transfer. Information & Management, 47(7–8), 356–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.08.003

Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university - industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0

Nielsen, C., & Cappelen, K. (2014). Exploring the Mechanisms of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Study of Companies, Students and Researchers. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(4), 375–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12035

Klomklieng, W., Ratanapanee, P., Tanchareon, S., & Meesap, K. (2012). Strengthening a Research Cooperation Using a Triple Helix Model: Case Study of Poultry Industry in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 120–129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.448

Koh, J. L. (1999). From hoops to hard drives: An accession law approach to the inevitable misappropriation of trade secrets. American University Law Review, 48: 271-358.

Susanty, A., Handayani, N. U., & Henrawan, M. Y. (2012). Key Success Factors that Influence Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness: A Case Study of Garment Sentra at Kabupaten Sragen. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 23–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00317-6

Ekore, J. O. (2014). Impact of key organizational factors on knowledge transfer success in multinational enterprises. Management, 19(2), 3–18.

Nor Aziati, A. H., Nor Hazana, A., & Ping, T. Y. (2014). Knowledge transfer of universityindustry partnership in Malaysian Technical University: Preliminary findings. ISTMET 2014 - 1st International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies, Proceedings, (Istmet), 205–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2014.6936507

Awang, A. H., & Malek, J. A. (2008). Promoting Knowledge Transfer in Science and Technology: A Case Study of Technology Park Malaysia (TPM). Croatian Economic Survey, 95–113.

Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Mohidin, R., Ahmad Saufi, R., & Mahmud, R. (2024). Proposed Knowledge Transfer Key Factors Model in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI22), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5813