Measuring Satisfaction with Life-construct among University Students during Covid-19 Pandemic in Sabah, Malaysia

Authors

  • Mohd Dahlan A. Malek Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil Faculty of Bussiness, Economics and Accountancy, University Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Adi Fahrudin Department of Psychology Organisation, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Adeymend Reny Japil Public Service Department, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5845

Keywords:

Satisfaction With Life, University Students, Measurement, Scale Development

Abstract

This research intended to develop a valid and reliable instrument of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) to measure satisfaction with life (SWL) constructs among 108 university students in Sabah, Malaysia, through the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) procedure. Using the extraction method of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Varimax Rotation, a component of the SWL construct is extracted with an eigenvalue of 3.1. The variance explained for this component is 62%. The construct of SWL has Cronbach's alpha value of .817. The development scale and validation confirmed that the instrument is consistent and stable with university student samples.

References

Albuquerque, F. J. B., de Sousa, F. M., & Martins, C. R. (2010). Validation of satisfaction with life scales and affects for rural elderly. Psycho, 41(1), 85-92.

Alghamdi, A. A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social and educational aspects of Saudi university students' lives. PLoS ONE, 16(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250026

Browning, M. H. E. M., Larson, L. R., Sharaievska, I., Rigolon, A., McAnirlin, O., Mullenbach, L., et al. (2021). Psychological impacts from COVID- 19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States. PLoS ONE 16(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245327

Chow, H. P. H. (2005). Life Satisfaction among University Students in a Canadian Prairie City: A Multivariate Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 70, 139-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-7526-0

Darling, C. A., McWey, L. M., Howard, S. N., & Olmstead, S. B. (2007). College student stress: The influence of interpersonal relationships on the sense of coherence. Stress and Health. Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 23(4), 215– 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1139

De Neve, J-E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013), The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being. In Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J., eds. World Happiness Report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

Delgado-Lobete, L., Montes-Montes, R., Vila-Paz, A., Talavera-Valverde, M-Á., Cruz-Valiño, J-M., Gándara-Gafo, B., Ávila-Álvarez, A., & Santos-del-Riego, S. (2020). Subjective Well-Being in Higher Education: Psychometric Properties of the Satisfaction with Life and Subjective Vitality Scales in Spanish University Students. Sustainability, 12(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062176

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective wellbeing. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American psychologist, 55(1), 34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.34

Dirzyte, A., Perminas, A., & Biliuniene, E. (2021). Psychometric Properties of Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) in the Lithuanian Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18(2608), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052608

de Sousa, E. M. P., Santos, W. S., Lopes, G. S., da Costa T. M., & Cristino, E. D. (2015). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence of validity and reliability in the Brazilian context. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 1(2), 41-50.

Gouveia, V. V., Chaves, S. D. S., Oliveira, I. D., Dias, M. R., Gouveia, R. S., & Andrade, P. D. (2003). The use of the GHQ-12 in a general population: A study of its construct validity]. Psicologia. Teoria e Pesquisa, 19(3), 241-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722003000300006

Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 267-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0

Holm-Hadulla, Rainer & Koutsoukou-Argyraki, Asimina. (2015). The mental health of Students in a globalized world: Prevalence of Complaints and Disorders, methods and effectivity of counselling, the structure of mental health Services for Students. Mental Health & Prevention, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2015.04.003

Kim, J. U., Majid, A., Judge, R., Crook, P., Nathwani, R., Selvapatt, N., Lovendoski, J., Manousou, P., Thursz, M., Dhar, A., & Lewis, H. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on alcohol consumption in patients with pre-existing alcohol use disorder. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 5(10), 886–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30251-X

Maroufizadeh, S., Ghaheri, A., Omani-Samani, R., & Ezabadi, Z. (2016). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in Iranian infertile women. International journal of reproductive biomedicine (Yazd, Iran), 14, 57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.14.1.57

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on medical education, 8(2), 90-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-019-0509-2

Paschali, A., & Tsitsas, G. (2010). Stress and Life Satisfaction among University Students—A Pilot Study. Annals of General Psychiatry, 9, S96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-S1-S96

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

A. Malek, M. D., Mohamed Kamil, I. S., Fahrudin, A., & Japil, A. R. (2024). Measuring Satisfaction with Life-construct among University Students during Covid-19 Pandemic in Sabah, Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI22), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5845