Factors Influencing Consumers Buying Intentions towards Electric Cars

Authors

  • Jit-Singh, Keshminder Department of Economics and Financial Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor Campus, 42300 Selangor, Malaysia,
  • Soo-Cheng, Chuah Department of Economics and Financial Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor Campus, 42300 Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rozita Naina Mohamed Department of Entrepreneurship and Marketing Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor Campus, 42300 Selangor, Malaysia
  • Theng-Huey Goh Country Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy ,Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI26.6787

Keywords:

Electric Vehicle, Valence Framework, Purchase Intention, PLS-SEM

Abstract

Electric vehicle adoption has grown considerably in these few years in Malaysia and is to grow. It is crucial to explore mechanism-driven consumers' intention to buy electric vehicles. This study uses the Valence Framework to investigate consumers' perception factors that influence their intention to purchase electric vehicles. This study applied the PLS-SEM technique for data analysis based on convenience sampling methods and a sample size of 582. The analysis revealed that perceived environment, monetary benefit, risk, and symbol significantly influence consumers' purchase intention on electric vehicles. However, the perceived fee was insignificant to consumers' purchase intention. Policy implications and recommendations for policymakers and industry players were provided for the growth of electric vehicles in the future.

References

Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Abdullah, R., Mahmoud, M., Alkinani, M. H., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 124474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474

Ballard, R. (1992). Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Psychological Reports, 71(3_suppl), 1155-1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1155

Chen, C.-f., Xu, X., & Frey, S. (2016). Who wants solar water heaters and alternative fuel vehicles? Assessing social–psychological predictors of adoption intention and policy support in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 15, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.006

Cheng, P., OuYang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2019). Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 124, 433-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.013

Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Featherman, M., Jia, S. J., Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847

Fennis, B. M., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2007). You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 634-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.013

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Vol. 2nd Edition). Sage Publications Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Haustein, S., Jensen, A. F., & Cherchi, E. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: Recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 149, 112096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112096

He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1060-1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.260

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hull, C., Giliomee, J. H., Visser, M., & Booysen, M. J. (2024). Electric vehicle adoption intention among paratransit owners and drivers in South Africa. Transport Policy, 146, 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.11.015

Jaiswal, D., Kaushal, V., Kant, R., & Singh, P. K. (2021). Consumer adoption intention for electric vehicles: Insights and evidence from Indian sustainable transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121089

Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco‐innovation adoption. Journal of consumer marketing, 27(4), 358-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052396

Jordan, S. (2023). Carrot or Stick? How Policy Type Influences Consumer Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Procedia, 70, 13-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.10.003

Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2010). Impacts of luxury fashion brand’s social media marketing on customer relationship and purchase intention. Journal of Global fashion marketing, 1(3), 164-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2010.10593068

Lee, H.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Peng, W.-D., Hu, C.-Y., Lee, C.-H., Hsu, Y.-J., . . . Huang, H.-L. (2020). Effectiveness of a theory of planned behavior-based intervention for promoting periodontal preventive behaviors among medical students in Taiwan. Journal of American College Health, 68(8), 883-890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1628029

Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., & Hladik, G. (2024). Adoption of electric vehicles: An empirical study of consumers’ intentions. Transport Economics and Management, 2, 359-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.team.2024.11.001

Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of consumer research, 2(1), 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208613

Ruan, T., & Lv, Q. (2023). Public perception of electric vehicles on Reddit and Twitter: A cross-platform analysis. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 21, 100872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100872

She, Z.-Y., Sun, Q., Ma, J.-J., & Xie, B.-C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001

Stone, M. (1974). Cross‐validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the royal statistical society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x

Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J., Wei, J., & Wang, C. (2020). An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation, 47, 397-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Jit-Singh, Keshminder, Soo-Cheng, Chuah, Rozita Naina Mohamed, & Theng-Huey Goh. (2025). Factors Influencing Consumers Buying Intentions towards Electric Cars. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI26), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI26.6787