Live Beyond Buildings: The street as the everyday living space in Istanbul, Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i6.995Keywords:
Interior, Temporal Living Space, Design Method, Quality of LifeAbstract
This paper attempts to reveal the importance of the everyday temporal living space on the street as the agency to improve the quality of life in the city. The temporal living space is the collective public space that is produced by the local inhabitants as the response to fulfil their sociocultural needs. This study employed time-based behavioural and spatial mappings to reveal how spatial alteration was employed by the locals, producing the particular spatial programming and atmospheres that allowed the interiorization of the street. The mappings would also reveal how the interaction of the local inhabitants within this temporal living space had impacts on the general wellbeing and the spatial identity of the city. The findings of this study were translated into an interior architectural design exercise, by developing design methods that were adopted from the locals’ spatial mechanisms in producing their temporal outdoor living spaces.
References
Amoroso, S. (2014). Interior Urbanism in Two Asia Pacific Cities: Spatial Intensifications in Hongkong and Hanoi. Monu Magazine on Urbanism, (21 Interior Urbanism), 72-77.
Attiwill, S. (2012) Beyond building: interior designs. IDEA Symposium 2012 (Interior: A State of Becoming), 1–7
Douglas, M. (2007) The idea of a home: a kind of place. in B. M. Lane (ed.), Housing and Dwelling: Perspectives on Modern Domestic Architecture (61-67). New York: Routledge
Farrelly, L., & Mitchell, B. (2011). Interior Room Urban Room. In E. Hollis et al. (ed.), Interior Tools Interior Tactics: Debates in Interiors Theory and Practice. Faringdon, Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to Study Public Life. Washington: Island Press.
Karnchanaporn, N. (2014). 150cm domestiCITY. In: SITUATION Symposium. Melbourne: Interior Design, RMIT University.
Koch, D. 2013. The Architectural Interface Inside-Out: Interior-exterior relations, spatial models, and configurational mirroring. Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium; 067. Seoul: Sejong University
Lim, S. (2011). Tactics of The Peripatetic: On Vendors’ Making an Interior of The Street. In E. Hollis et al. (ed.), Interior Tools Interior Tactics: Debates in Interiors Theory and Practice. Faringdon, Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.
Rybczynksi, W. (2011) Domesticity. In L. Weinthal (ed.), Toward a New Interior, An Anthology of Interior Design Theory (394-403). New York: Princeton Architectural Press
Shaw, P. and Hudson, J. (2009). The Qualities of Informal Space: (Re)appropriation within the informal, interstitial spaces of the city. In: Occupation: Negotiations with Constructed Space. Brighton: University of Brighton.
Winton, A. G. (2013). Inhabited Space: Critical Theories and the Domestic Interior. In G. Brooker & L. Weinthal (Eds.), The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design (20–29). London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
Yatmo, Y. (2008). Street Vendors as ‘Out of Place’ Urban Elements. Journal of Urban Design, 13(3), 387-402.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anak Agung Ayu Suci Warakanyaka, Paramita Atmodiwirjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
