Charge It Right: Unveiling the Factors to Effective Development Charge Implementation

Authors

  • Siti Fairuz Che Pin Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nor Azalina Yusnita Abdul Rahman Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Nor Aini Salleh Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Fatemeh Khozaei Department of Architectural Engineering, Colleague of Engineering, Dhofar University, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5799

Keywords:

Development Charge, Local Government, Efficient Implementation

Abstract

Development charges are a globally adopted concept to ease the burden on local governments due to urbanization. Implemented in countries like the US, UK, Australia, Singapore, Canada, and South Africa, Malaysia follows suit with charges tied to increased land value. Based on structured interviews with 39 stakeholders, this study identifies key factors for effective implementation: legislation, human capital, work procedures, and support facilities. Participants highlight the need for streamlined approval processes and strategic integration among departments. Successful development charge implementation optimises land use, reducing infrastructure costs and benefiting public interests.

References

Ahmad Atory Hussain (1991), “Kerajaan Tempatan – Teori dan Peranan di Malaysia.”, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Akta. 2010. Akta Kerajaan Tempatan 1976 (Akta 171). Kuala Lumpur: International Law Book Services.

Bogdan, R.C. And Biklen, S.K. (2007) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 5th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330883

Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases. John Wiley & Sons.

Kanun Tanah Negara 1965: 1 Januari 1966 (melalui L.N 474/1965).

Kenneth S. Bordens, Bruce B. Abbott. Research and Design Methods: A Process Approach. McGraw-Hill, 2005 - Psychologie - 499 pages

Labatt, S., & White, R. R. (2002). Environmental finance: A guide to environmental risk assessment and financial products. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Leung Yew Kwong (1987), Development Land and Development Charge in Singapore P 129.

L. Keeble (1969) Principles and Practice of Town and Country Planning. Semantic Scholar. Economics.

L.Wirth (1 July 1938). Urbanism As a Way of Life. Sociology. American Journal of Sociology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/217913

Markus Moos and Andrejs Skaburskis, (2023). The Characteristics and Location of Home Workers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver Sage Jurnals Volume 44, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701507639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701507639

Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, Johnny Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis SAGE, 2014 - Social Science - 381 Pages

Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications, Inc.

Meadows KA (2003). An introduction to qualitative methods. Br J Community Nurs. 2003 Oct;8(10):464-9. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2003.8.10.11700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2003.8.10.11700

Merriam, S.B. (2001) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

Mohd Haris Yeop (2016). Kajian Caj Pembangunan Di Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan. Seminar Penyelidikan Ke Tujuh (7). Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. Longman Singapore Publisher (Pte) Ltd 1991. ISBN 9971-89-998-1.1991.

Morris Zelditch Jr., “Theories of Legitimacy,” in The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, ed. John T. Jost and Brenda Major (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 33–53.

Mok, O. (2017). Penang’s Development Charges Reason Why Property Prices High, UMNO Rep Says. Malay Mail. 25 Disember 2017.

Mohd. Majid Konting, (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. January 1, By Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka (ISBN10: 9836214046).

N. E. Slack (1993). The land use implications of alternative municipal financial tools a discussion paper. 1st ed. An edition of The land use implications of alternative municipal financial tools: a discussion paper.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-24

How to Cite

Che Pin, S. F., Abdul Rahman, N. A. Y., Salleh, N. A., & Khozaei, F. (2024). Charge It Right: Unveiling the Factors to Effective Development Charge Implementation. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(27), 469–475. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5799

Most read articles by the same author(s)