Legal Analysis of Malaysia’s Integrated Dispute Resolution Scheme: Lessons from Other Countries

Authors

  • Muhamad Ikhwan Mohd Zain Faculty of Law, UiTM Shah Alam
  • Assoc Prof Dr Nur Ezan Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Dr Ibtisam@Ilyana Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Dr Setiyono Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5809

Keywords:

Integration, Financial Dispute, Consumer, Malaysia

Abstract

The Central Bank of Malaysia and the Securities Commission Malaysia have suggested a consolidation to establish the Integrated Dispute Resolution Scheme (IDRS) for Malaysian financial consumers. The objective of the merger is to streamline and enhance the procedures for resolving disputes. This study examines the legal perspective in determining the most effective legal structures for resolving disputes efficiently. The study employs qualitative data and secondary data from Indonesia and Australia to acquire insights. The study emphasises the potential advantages of the IDRS, such as enhanced dispute resolution services, greater outcomes, and increased satisfaction for consumers seeking alternative dispute resolution platforms.

References

Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2021). Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector: Dispute Resolution Efforts in Consumer Protection Framework. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v10i1.48684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v10i1.48684

AFCA. (2022). AFCA Operational Guidelines to the Rules.

Agus, S., Adi, S., Hari, P., & Kadim, A. (2022). Alternative Model of Consumer Dispute Settlement Financial Service Sector in Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(2), 1–10. http://repository.upi-yai.ac.id/id/eprint/194

Australian Financial Complaints Authority. (2020). Helping consumers, small businesses and financial firms resolve complaints. That’s what AFCA does.

Constitution of OFS, OFS (2021). https://www.ofs.org.my/file/files/OFS%20New%20Constitution%202021.pdf

Diniyya, A. A., Aulia, M., & Wahyudi, R. (2021). Financial Technology Regulation in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Comparative Study. Ihtifaz: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking, 3(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v3i2.2703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v3i2.2703

Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001

Ford, K. (2023, November 21). AFCA hits 400k disputes in 5 years. Independent Financial Adviser. https://www.ifa.com.au/news/33570-afca-hits-400k-disputes-in-5-years

Greenhalgh, A. (2019). Will the Creation of AFCA Be of Benefit to the Parties That Come Before It? Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal (Online), 29, 281–288.

Ilias, I. a. k. a I., Mohd Zain, M. I., Rahmat, N. E., & Keumala, D. (2023). A Comparative Assessment of Alternative Dispute Resolution for Financial Consumer Protection in Malaysia and Indonesia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI13), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI13.5041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI13.5041

INFO Network. (2007). International Network of Financial Services Ombudsman Schemes. https://www.networkfso.org/

Noone, M. A., & Ojelabi, L. A. (2020). Alternative dispute resolution and access to justice in Australia. International Journal of Law in Context, 16(2), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000099

Nurhayati, S., Nurjamil, N., & Fadhillah, M. H. (2022). Measuring Opportunities and Challenges in Dispute Resolution of Fintech Sharia Business Through LAPS. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.929

OFS. (2022). OFS Annual Report. https://www.ofs.org.my/file/files/OFS_2022_AnnualReport.pdf

OFS Terms of Reference, 1 (2016). https://www.ofs.org.my/file/files/OFS_Term of Reference_1October 2016_Implementation.pdf

Schmulow, A. D., Dore, V., Reardon, J., & Hanna, W. (2020). AFCA: the first foothill between Australia’s Twin Peaks. Law and Financial Market Review. https://ro.uow.edu.au/balpapers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2020.1810906

Schutt, K. R. (1995). Features of Qualitative Data Analysis. In Investigating the Social World. SAGE Publication.

Sharma, S., KC Poh, S., & Palaraja, K. (2020, September). The Future of Dispute Resolution. PP, 2(035044).

Yayeh, F. A. (2021). Focus Group Discussion as a data collection tool in Economics. www.daagu.org

Downloads

Published

2024-03-16

How to Cite

Mohd Zain, M. I., Rahmat, N. E., Ilias, I., & Setiyono. (2024). Legal Analysis of Malaysia’s Integrated Dispute Resolution Scheme: Lessons from Other Countries. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(28), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5809

Most read articles by the same author(s)