Public Accountability and Deviant Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5826Keywords:
Public Accountability;, Organisational Deviance, Interpersonal Deviance, Public AccountabilityAbstract
This study aims to conduct empirical research regarding the issue of deviant behavior among public administrators. Organizational and interpersonal deviances have been used, describing deviance as a multidimensional construct. The study also identified public accountability dimensions; external accountability, internal accountability, leadership, and personality as contributors to the deviance problem. The structural equation modelling showed all constructs showed a degree of validity and reliability and indicated a fit model. Public accountability dimensions have caused variance in organizational and interpersonal deviance, except leadership. The findings can be used by decision-makers to identify the effect of public accountability against deviant behavior.
References
Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability and Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior : A specific test of a General Theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094592
Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.
Dewangan, R., & Verghese, M. (2018). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(2), 974–977.
Di Carlo, E. (2022). Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x
Gadi, P. D., Bagobiri, E., & Ali, J. (2022). Perceptions of Ethical Climate on Deviant Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work Spirituality. Journal of Production, Operations Management and Economics, 17(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.24.1.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.24.1.17
Gomis-Pomares, A., Villanueva, L., & Basto-Pereira, M. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Deviant Behavior Variety Scale in Young Spanish Adults. Psicothema, 34(2), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.317
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate and data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Hamoudah, M. M., Othman, Z., Abdul Rahman, R., Mohd Noor, N. A., & Alamoudi, M. (2021). Ethical Leadership, Ethical Climate and Integrity Violation: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020043
Hooijberg, R., & Choi, J. (2001). The impact of organizational characteristics on leadership effectiveness models : An examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organization. Administration & Society, 33(4), 403–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399701334002
Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Impact of competing accountability requirements on perceived work performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329469
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining the sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement1, 30, 607–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lussier, R. N. (2008). Human relations in organizations: Applications and skill building (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. M., Dijke, M. Van, & Cremer, D. De. (2012). Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 24–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
Nik Hazimah Nik Mat, & Zaharul Nizal Zabidi. (2010). Professionalism in practices: A preliminary study on Malaysian public universities. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 138–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n8p138
Nur Husnina, J. J., Nurfara Ain, M. F., & Aida, A. (2022). Light Triad Personality and Team Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2022.6.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2022.6.5
Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a Public Administration Theory of Felt Accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Patterson, A., & Baron, S. (2010). Deviant employees and dreadful service encounters: Customer tales of discord and distrust. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 438–445. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/08876041011072555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072555
Puteh, A., Mohd Ali, N. A., Don, A. G., & Aini, Z. (2020). Understanding the Concept of Integrity among Malaysian Immigration Department Staff State of Kedah. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11(8), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n8p12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n8p12
Quinn, S. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennet, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multdimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256693
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/975901
Siti-Nabiha Abdul Khalid. (2010). Improving the service delivery: A case study of a local authority in Malaysia. Global Business Review, 11(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090901100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090901100104
Wulani, F., Handoko, T. H., & Purwanto, B. M. (2022). Supervisor-directed OCB and deviant behaviors: the role of LMX and impression management motives. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1410–1426. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0406
Zainudin Awang. (2014). A handbook on SEM: For academicians and practitioners.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aida Abdullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.