Public Accountability and Deviant Behavior

Authors

  • Aida Abdullah Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seremban, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5826

Keywords:

Public Accountability;, Organisational Deviance, Interpersonal Deviance, Public Accountability

Abstract

This study aims to conduct empirical research regarding the issue of deviant behavior among public administrators. Organizational and interpersonal deviances have been used, describing deviance as a multidimensional construct. The study also identified public accountability dimensions; external accountability, internal accountability, leadership, and personality as contributors to the deviance problem. The structural equation modelling showed all constructs showed a degree of validity and reliability and indicated a fit model. Public accountability dimensions have caused variance in organizational and interpersonal deviance, except leadership. The findings can be used by decision-makers to identify the effect of public accountability against deviant behavior.

References

Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability and Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301

Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior : A specific test of a General Theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094592

Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

Dewangan, R., & Verghese, M. (2018). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(2), 974–977.

Di Carlo, E. (2022). Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x

Gadi, P. D., Bagobiri, E., & Ali, J. (2022). Perceptions of Ethical Climate on Deviant Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work Spirituality. Journal of Production, Operations Management and Economics, 17(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.24.1.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.24.1.17

Gomis-Pomares, A., Villanueva, L., & Basto-Pereira, M. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Deviant Behavior Variety Scale in Young Spanish Adults. Psicothema, 34(2), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.317

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate and data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Hamoudah, M. M., Othman, Z., Abdul Rahman, R., Mohd Noor, N. A., & Alamoudi, M. (2021). Ethical Leadership, Ethical Climate and Integrity Violation: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020043

Hooijberg, R., & Choi, J. (2001). The impact of organizational characteristics on leadership effectiveness models : An examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organization. Administration & Society, 33(4), 403–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399701334002

Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Impact of competing accountability requirements on perceived work performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329469

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining the sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement1, 30, 607–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lussier, R. N. (2008). Human relations in organizations: Applications and skill building (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. M., Dijke, M. Van, & Cremer, D. De. (2012). Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 24–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003

Nik Hazimah Nik Mat, & Zaharul Nizal Zabidi. (2010). Professionalism in practices: A preliminary study on Malaysian public universities. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 138–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n8p138

Nur Husnina, J. J., Nurfara Ain, M. F., & Aida, A. (2022). Light Triad Personality and Team Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2022.6.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2022.6.5

Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a Public Administration Theory of Felt Accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Patterson, A., & Baron, S. (2010). Deviant employees and dreadful service encounters: Customer tales of discord and distrust. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 438–445. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/08876041011072555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072555

Puteh, A., Mohd Ali, N. A., Don, A. G., & Aini, Z. (2020). Understanding the Concept of Integrity among Malaysian Immigration Department Staff State of Kedah. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11(8), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n8p12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n8p12

Quinn, S. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Robinson, S. L., & Bennet, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multdimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256693

Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/975901

Siti-Nabiha Abdul Khalid. (2010). Improving the service delivery: A case study of a local authority in Malaysia. Global Business Review, 11(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090901100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090901100104

Wulani, F., Handoko, T. H., & Purwanto, B. M. (2022). Supervisor-directed OCB and deviant behaviors: the role of LMX and impression management motives. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1410–1426. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0406

Zainudin Awang. (2014). A handbook on SEM: For academicians and practitioners.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Abdullah, A. (2024). Public Accountability and Deviant Behavior. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI22), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI22.5826

Most read articles by the same author(s)