Corruption in the Public Sector: Determinants, implications and solutions

Authors

  • Aida Abdullah Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Falih Suaedi Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Shahidah Abdul Razak Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI38.7655

Keywords:

Corruption, culture, digitization, leadership

Abstract

Corruption in the public sector remains a major challenge, particularly in developing countries. This study explores the psychological, organizational, and situational factors that drive corrupt behavior among civil servants. Drawing on empirical data and theoretical frameworks such as the Fraud Triangle, Public Service Motivation theory, and the Corruption Hexagon Model, this study explores how moral framework, leadership and life events influence corrupt behavior. Findings suggest that corrupt practices, including procurement fraud and bribery, have implications for perpetrators, victims, and national development. The study concludes with solutions that target institutional culture and reform, authentic leadership, and improved law enforcement.

References

Abdelrahim, Y. (2024). The influence of personal and economic oppression on a country's corruption levels worldwide. Heliyon, 10(12).

Abdul-Salam, A., Adam, I. O., Alhassan, M. D., Gbambegu Umar, A., & Nterful, J. (2024). Examining the linkages between digitalisation, public service delivery and corruption in Ghana. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 241-256.

Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states. A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(65), 5-22.

Cheliatsidou, A., Sariannidis, N., Garefalakis, A., Passas, I., & Spinthiropoulos, K. (2023). Exploring attitudes towards whistleblowing in relation to sustainable municipalities. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 199.

Cho, B., & Kim, H. (2025). Breaking up male‐dominated collusive arrangements: Women's representation in bureaucracy and corruption. Public Administration, 103(1), 201-219.

Clemente, F., de Sousa, L., Rego, R., & Calca, P. (2024). Why are individuals unwilling to report corruption? An inquiry into perception‐based definitions of corruption and employment‐related factors. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(4), 625-646.

De Waele, L., Weißmüller, K. S., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2021). Bribery and the role of public service motivation and social value orientation: A multi-site experimental study in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655964.

Eryanto, D., van Eeden Jones, I., & Lasthuizen, K. (2022). The troubling impact of political interference in Indonesian public sector institutions on ethical leadership credibility. International Journal of Public Leadership, 18(4), 319-336.

Harnois, Y. G., & Gagnon, S. (2022). Fighting corruption in international development: a grounded theory of managing projects within a complex socio-cultural context. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(5), 677-712.

Hussain, G., Samreen, F., Ismail, W. K. W., Riaz, A., & Azhar, J. (2021). From Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: A cross-level examination of cultural factors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, e46.

Kulmie, D. A. (2023). Financial crimes in Somali public sector: Causes and consequences. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 15(4), 1-18.

Litina, A., & Varvarigos, D. (2023). Family ties and corruption. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 23(1), 195-222.

Marjerison, R. K., & Gatto, A. (2024). Public sector digitalization, corruption, and sustainability in the developing world: A scoping review. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5627-5638.

Mentzer, M. S. (2024). Political culture and the resource curse: public sector corruption across the United States. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(10), 2084-2099.

Ogungbamila, B., & Ajayi, O. F. (2024). Relationship between moral intelligence and corruption tolerance among public sector employees: Does life satisfaction matter?. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 8(2), 61-69.

Onyango, G. (2024). Social processes of public sector collaborations in Kenya: unpacking challenges of realising joint actions in public administration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-31.

Prysmakova, P., & Evans, M. D. (2022). Whistleblowing motivation and gender: Vignette-based study in a local government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 165-190.

Sri Ramalu, S., & Janadari, N. (2022). Authentic leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: the role of psychological capital. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(2), 365-385.

Suardi, I., Rossieta, H., Djakman, C., & Diyanty, V. (2024). Procurement governance in reducing corruption in the indonesian public sector: a mixed method approach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2393744.

Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., Tepe, M., & Yair, O. (2022). Public-sector honesty and corruption: field evidence from 40 countries. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 310-325.

Thomann, E., Ioannidis, G., Zgaga, T., & Schwarz, F. (2025). Explaining Public Sector Corruption: The Hexagon Model. Governance, 38(2), e70000.

Zaloznaya, M. (2022). The civic crime of corruption: Citizen networks and public sector bribery in the non-democracies. Theoretical Criminology, 26(4), 641-663.

Zandi, S., Esmaeili, M., & Farahbakhsh, K. (2024). Individual and contextual factors associated with the prevention of corruption: A qualitative study among Iranian public employees. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2024(1), 9971954.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Abdullah, A., Suaedi, F., & Abdul Razak, S. (2025). Corruption in the Public Sector: Determinants, implications and solutions. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI38), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI38.7655