Content Validity of Digital Knowledge using CVI Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI20.6092Keywords:
Content Validity Index, Instrumentation, Digital KnowledgeAbstract
This study aims to examine the content validity of Digital Knowledge for TESL pre-service teachers using Content Validity Index (CVI). Seven experts were selected via purposive sampling evaluated the content. Four professional university experts in multimedia learning, digital, and psychometrics, and three subject matter experts from Institute of Teacher Education Malaysia (ITEM) were consulted. The instruments involved 73 items with three main constructs. The result showed that the instrument has good content validity and suggests that Digital Knowledge has a great potential to be promoted as good instrument to measure TESL pre-service teachers’ perception of writing essay.
References
Catherine, P. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Understanding Research : A Consumer ’s Guide (2nd ed.).
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development Theory and Applications. วารสารวิชาการมหาวิทยาลัยอีสเทิร์นเอเชีย, 4(1), 88–100.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574
Konting, M. M. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Nur Farhana Ramli. (2019). Development and Validation of an Instrument To Measure Science Teachers ’ Instructional Preparedness in Stem. July.
Polit, C. T. B. D. F. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2005). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Ramli, N. F. binti, Talib, O. bin, Manaf, U. K. binti A., & Hassan, S. A. binti. (2018). Content Validity of STEMTIP Using CVR Method. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4559
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons.
Rubio, D. M. G., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifyng content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
Simms, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L. (2019). Does the Number of Response Options Matter? Psychometric Perspectives Using Personality Questionnaire Data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648
Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences.
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rohaida A Rahmat, Siti Bahirah Saidi, Nazatul Syima Mohd Nasir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
