Comparison of Concept Transferring Procedures of Basic Idea between Handmade Design and Computer Modeling

Authors

  • Pracha Pijukkana King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
  • Yanin Rugwongwan King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i5.638

Abstract

This research aims to make a comparative study of the performance results between creating the basic idea designs by handmade design process and by computer modeling process. The study of product design by using handmade process and computer modeling process has the same objectives which are to generate ideas and encourage creativity in product design. Though these two processes are done by using different tools, they have the same idea of using the interactive between brain, hand, and forms that appear on the paper or on the computer to improve and Idea Development, Sketch Design. Also, these two processes are used as an approach to teach and learn industrial product design, they can be chosen to suit students with different features and can be used to increase academic achievement performance.

Keywords: Basic Idea, Handmade Design, Computer Modeling, Industrial Product Design.

ISSN: 2398-4287© 2017. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, UniversitiTeknologi MARA, Malaysia.

References

Authority, V. C. (2013). Product Design and Technology. Victoria, Australian: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

Duku. (2014, October 20). CAD (Computer Aided Design). Retrieved from http://www.duku-design.co.uk/cad.html

Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects and designers. London: Vanostand.

Mohamad Adi, F. e. (2015). Conceptualisation as Key Factor in Seizing. Journal of ASIAN Behavioral Studies, 5(20), 13-23.

Nordin, N. e. (2016). Assessing Readiness for Self-Directed Learning among College Students in the Provision of Higher Learning Institution. 7thAcE-Bs2016Taipei (pp. 91-101). Taiwan: AMER ABRA.

Ruengtam, P. (2014). Cooperative/Collaborative Learning in an Interior Architectural Program. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 4(17), 31-40.

Sahachaisaeree, N. (2004). Sustainable paradigm in interior design. Bangkok: Kasembundit University.

Scho¨n, D. A. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135-156.

Woodbury, R. F. (2006). Whither design space’’ artificial intelligence. Analysis and Manufacture, 20(2), 63-82. doi:10.1017/S0890060406060057.

Yusoff, S. B. (2007). Automotive Sketching Techniques from Education and Professional Practice. Birmingham City: Birmingham City University.

Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by design: tools for environment-behavior research. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Published

2017-03-18

How to Cite

Pijukkana, P., & Rugwongwan, Y. (2017). Comparison of Concept Transferring Procedures of Basic Idea between Handmade Design and Computer Modeling. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(5), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i5.638

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>