Six Elements in Promoting Open Science: Malaysian academicians’ research practices in information science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI31.6934Keywords:
Open Science, Research Data Management, Attitude, AcademicianAbstract
The Malaysia Open Science Platform (MOSP) has been a challenging path for open science due to the ongoing planning and construction of the crucial organizational enablers. This study aims to understand the pre-MOSP research practices by exploring data management, identifying any existing Open Science Practices (OSPs), and assessing attitudes toward open science in information science. In-depth interviews with five researchers discovered six elements for promoting open science, namely 1) incentivization and recognition, 2) policy framework, 3) education, awareness, and Research Data Management (RDM) services, 4) collaboration and interdisciplinary platforms, 5) open access repositories, and 6) technological infrastructure.
References
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing. Social Psychology, 50(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2021). The landscape of Open Science in Malaysia.
Ahmed, M., & Othman, R. (2021a). Promoting Open Science with Institutional Repositories In The Malaysian Comprehensive Public Universities. Journal of Information Systems and Digital Technologies 3(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/jisdt.v3i2.209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/jisdt.v3i2.209
Ahmed, M., & Othman, R. (2021b). Readiness towards the implementation of Open Science initiatives in the Malaysian Comprehensive Public Universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2021.102368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102368
Chigwada, J. P. (2022). Management and Maintenance Of Research Data By Researchers in Zimbabwe. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(4/5), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0079
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0701/2006031956-t.html
Gallagher, R. V., Falster, D. S., Maitner, B. S., Salguero-Gómez, R., Vandvik, V., Pearse, W. D., Schneider, F. D., Kattge, J., Poelen, J. H., Madin, J. S., Ankenbrand, M. J., Penone, C., Feng, X., Adams, V. M., Alroy, J., Andrew, S. C., Balk, M. A., Bland, L. M., Boyle, B. L., … Enquist, B. J. (2020). Open Science Principles For Accelerating Trait-Based Science Across the Tree of Life. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4(3), (294–303). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1109-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1109-6
Gownaris, N. J., Vermeir, K., Bittner, M.-I., Gunawardena, L., Kaur-Ghumaan, S., Lepenies, R., Ntsefong, G. N., & Zakari, I. S. (2022). Barriers to Full Participation in the Open Science Life Cycle among Early Career Researchers. Data Science Journal, 21. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-002
Hassan, S., & Chindamo, P. (2017). Governance in practice: Effective data governance: From strategy through to implementation. Governance Directions, 69(4), 207–210. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.797284650927055
Heck, T., Peters, I., Mazarakis, A., Scherp, A., & Blümel, I. (2020). Open Science Practices in Higher Education: Discussion of Survey Results From Research and Teaching Staff in Germany. Education for Information 36(3), https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190272
Hodonu-Wusu, J. O., Noorhidawati, A., & Abrizah, A. (2020). Malaysian Researchers on Open Data: The First National Survey on Awareness, Practices and Attitudes. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 25(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no2.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no2.1
Hong, M., & Moran, A. (2019). An introduction to Open Science. How To Incorporate Best Practices into Your Research. Psychological Science Agenda. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2019/02/open-science
Ikeuchi, U., Omori, Y., & Hayashi, K. (2022). State of Open Research Data in Japan: Behaviour towards Data Stewardship. 17th International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6592094
Jasmi, K. A. (2010). Guru Cemerlang Pendidikan Islam Sekolah Menengah Di Malaysia: Satu Kajian Kes. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Kim, J., Hwang, H., Jung, Y., Cho, S.-N., & Seo, T.-S. (2023). Data sharing attitudes and practices of researchers in Korean Government Research Institutes: A Survey-Based Descriptive Study. Science Editing, 10(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.299
Krishnan, U., Rahim, N. A., Mohamed, Z. Bin, & Salim, F. B. (2022). Strategic Framework Towards Open Science Adoption in Malaysia. 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Conference - Asia Pacific, TEMSCON-ASPAC 2022, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON-ASPAC52831.2022.9916546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON-ASPAC52831.2022.9916546
Pardo Martínez, C., & Poveda, A. (2018). Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers—A Case Study for Colombia. Information, 9(11), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110292
Patton, M. Q., & Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
Skelly, L., & Chiware, E. R. T. (2022). African researchers do not think differently about Open Data. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.950212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.950212
Smith, M. L., & Seward, R. (2017). Openness as Social Praxis. First Monday, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7073
Steinhardt, I., Bauer, M., Wünsche, H., & Schimmler, S. (2023). The connection of Open Science Practices and the Methodological Approach of Researchers. Quality & Quantity, 57(4), 3621–3636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Tenney, E. R., Costa, E., Allard, A., & Vazire, S. (2021). Open Science and Reform Practices in Organizational Behavior Research Over Time (2011 to 2019). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2020.10.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.015
Thelwall, M., Khan, N., & Kousha, K. (2023). Data Sharing and Reuse Practices: Disciplinary Differences And Improvements Needed. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423
Turcan, N., Cuciureanu, G., Cujba, R., Lupu, V., Cheradi, N., & Cojocaru, I. (2022). Perception of Open Science in the Scientific Community of the Republic of Moldova. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 294–334. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/519
Yusoff, M. (2001). Penyelidikan kualitatif : Pengalaman Kerja Lapangan Kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wahidah Mohd Zain, Paula Lackie, Zahril Shahida Ahmad, Norkamarizal Kamarudin, Siti Khairiyah Nordin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.