Reimagining Urban Riverfront Revitalization: Extracting Pasig River’s Common Landscape Characteristics on Instagram for GenAI Prompt Engineering

Authors

  • Ruben Jr. Felizarte Doctor of Philosophy in the Designed and Built Environment Student, College of Architecture, Integrated Graduate Program, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines/ Faculty, Department of Architecture, Institute of Architecture and Fine Arts, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines

Keywords:

GenAI, Pasig River, revitalization, urban landscape

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly text-to-image technology, is becoming more accessible and prevalent. It has become a tool for reimagining urban landscape scenarios (ULSs), in which landscape elements and forms reflect ideal urban living quality for urban landscape studies. This study examines how a generative model can address emerging urban needs, focusing on the Pasig River in Manila, Philippines—the backbone of the city's urban development. To do so, the study explored the depths of landscape aesthetics using a relevant source of landscape information—the online commons—grounded in Post-media Aesthetics and Social Capital theories. Four methods were employed in this study: data mining, AI object detection, prompt engineering, and ULS generation. Using Instagram, image posts with the #PasigRiver hashtag and geotagged within the City of Manila, from pre- and post-Pasig River Development Project Phase 1, were extracted and screened based on a set of landscape characteristics criteria. VisionAI v2.1-2.5 and ChatGPT-4o mini were used to extract and generate summarized visual descriptions from the images. Using an established scene format prompt, extracted summarized visual prompts, and standardized advance prompts, combined prompts were formed. The Midjourney application via a Discord bot was used to process and test the combined prompts to generate the ULSs. The ULS final sampling revealed a landscape composition of a vibrant urban river scenery at night, a prominent bridge, various river-related activities, and linear parks- figuratively reflecting the common landscape characteristics of urban riverfront revitalization. We argue that the use of GenAI image-to-text, text-to-text, and text-to-image technologies can visualize data from the digital realm, demonstrating that the engineering process captures visual cues and emerging meanings from the study area. Ultimately, the multi-method GenAI processes introduced in the study enable GenAI users to facilitate digital placemaking that visually communicates their shifting landscape preferences for URR developments.

References

Kapsalis, T. (2024). UrbanGenAI: Reconstructing Urban Landscapes using Panoptic Segmentation and Diffusion Models. Cornell University- arXiv.org. arXiv:2401.14379.

Guridi, J. A., Cheyre, C., Goula, M., Santo, D., Humphreys, L., Shankar, A., & Souras, A. (2024). Image Generative AI to Design Public Spaces: a Reflection of how AI Could Improve Co-Design of Public Parks. Digital Government. https://doi.org/10.1145/3656588

Phillips, C., Jiao, J., & Clubb, E. (2024). Testing the capability of AI art tools for urban design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 44(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2024.3356169.

Felizarte, R. M. (2024). Reimagining recreational landscapes: A generative AI-aided comparative study of academic greenspaces at IPB University and UP Los Baños. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1384(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1384/1/012036

Kavouras, I., Rallis, I., Sardis, E., Protopapadakis, E., Doulamis, A., & Doulamis, N. (2024). Multi-scale Intervention Planning based on Generative Design. Cornell University- arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15492

Rose, G., Hind, S., Rodgers, S., Degen, M., Ward, I., Krajina, Z., Aiello, G., McKim, J., Datta, A., & Duru, A. (2022). Seeing the city digitally. In Amsterdam University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727037

Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. London: MIT Press.

Barns, S. (2019). “Negotiating the Platform Pivot: From Participatory Digital Ecosystems to Infrastructures of Everyday Life.” Geography Compass 13 (9). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12464.

Ash, J., Anderson, B., Gordon, R., & Langley, P. (2017). “Unit, Vibration, Tone: A Post-Phenomenological Method for Researching Digital Interfaces.” Cultural Geographies 25 (1): 165–81.

Leszczynski, A. (2019). “Platform Affects of Geolocation.” Geoforum 107: 207–15-2019b. “Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, October, 026377581987872.

Bimbao, J.A., & Navarra, N.L. (2023). Commons of Instagram: A Source of Landscape Aesthetics. International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design and Practice, 16(1). https://frsb.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/20230627104854AR.9.pdf.

Soedarsono, W., Astuti, E. Y., Paramitasari, A. U., Asriana, N., Putri, D., & Zahra, A. (2021). Placemaking in the Digital Era: A Case Study of M Bloc Space- Jakarta. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211126.018

Sugangga, M., Paramitasari, A., Martokusumo, W., & Wibowo, A. S. (2021). Revitalization of Kota Lama Semarang and early signs of digital place making through Instagram. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211126.020

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Manovich, L. (2001). Post-media Aesthetics. From https://www.alice.id.tue.nl/references/manovich-2005.pdf

Putnam, Robert. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Felizarte, R. J. (2026). Reimagining Urban Riverfront Revitalization: Extracting Pasig River’s Common Landscape Characteristics on Instagram for GenAI Prompt Engineering. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(38). Retrieved from https://ebpj.e-iph.co.uk/index.php/EBProceedings/article/view/7996