Developing a Framework of Citizen’s Engagement in Open Government Data’s Website

Authors

  • Siti Mahfudzah Ashahril Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Puncak Perdana Campus, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azman Mat Isa Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Puncak Perdana Campus, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Norizan Anwar Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Puncak Perdana Campus, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI12.5032

Keywords:

Research Framework, Open Government Data, Open Data, Citizen Engagement, Information Quality

Abstract

Website is one of the OGD initiatives that provide input and spread information to the public. This research’s objective is to develop a framework for citizen engagement in using OGD’s website, i.e. Ministry’s websites. This research proposes a few combinations of determinants from the Theory of Human Behavior, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), and Information System Success Model (ISSM). This research will provide input and information on how the implementation of OGD in Malaysia can become a sustainable innovation in developing a user-friendly website to attract engagement from the public.

References

Abun, D., Magallanes, T., & Incarnacion, M. J. (2019). College Students’ Cognitive and Affective Attitude toward Higher Education and Their Academic Engagement. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(5), 1494–1507. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.45.38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.45.38

Ahmad, Z., & Warriach, N. F. (2020). Civic Engagement through Open Government Data : Challenges and the Way Forward Civic Engagement through Open Government Data : Challenges and the. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).

Al-Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Abdul Hamid, N. A. (2014). The relationship between system quality, information quality, and organizational performance. International Journal of Knowledge and Research in Management & E-Commerce, 4(3), 7–10.

Aldholay, A., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Abdulsalam, R., & Al-Shibami, A. H. (2018). An extension of Delone and McLean IS success model with self-efficacy: Online learning usage in Yemen. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2017-0116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2017-0116

Andrei, A. G., Zait, A., Stoian, C., Tugulea, O., & Manolica, A. (2020). Citizen engagement in the “ post-truth era ” A knowledge management inquiry into the online spread of information. 49(5), 1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2019-0178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2019-0178

Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006

Attfield, S., Piwowarski, B., & Kazai, G. (2011). Towards a science of user engagement.

Benmoussa, K., Laaziri, M., Khoulji, S., Kerkeb, M. L., & Yamami, A. El. (2018). Impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality on the efficiency of information systems. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3286606.3286818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3286606.3286818

Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City, and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479

Buabeng-andoh, C. (2018). of reasoned action and technology acceptance model Predicting students ’ intention to adopt mobile learning A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004

Carr, S. J., & Lassiter, A. (2017). Big Data , Small Apps : Premises and Products of the Civic Hackathon. Springer Geography, 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3_29

Cegarra-navarro, J., Garcia-perez, A., & Moreno-cegarra, J. L. (2014). Technology knowledge and governance : Empowering citizen engagement and participation. Government Information Quarterly, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.001

Chen, C., & Hung, S. (2010). Information & Management To give or to receive ? Factors influencing members ’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001

Cosgriff, C. V, Ebner, D. K., & Celi, L. A. (2020). Data sharing in the era of COVID-19. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30082-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30082-0

Daud, M., & Zulhuda, S. (2019). Open Data and Right to Information in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis. 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2018, (Citsm), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674259

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dawes, S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Dawes & Helbig_Information Strategies for Open Govt.(2010).pdf. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 50–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5

Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Fitriani, W. R., Hidayanto, A. N., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., & Purwandari, B. (2017). Determinants of Intention to Use Open Data Website : An Insight from Indonesia. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).

Fitriati, A., Pratama, B. C., Tubastuvi, N., & Anggoro, S. (2020). Study Of Delone-Mclean Information System Success Model : The Study Of Delone-Mclean Information System Success Model : The Relationship Between. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(3), 477–487.

Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001

Haro-de-rosario, A., Sáez-martín, A., & Caba-pérez, M. C. (2016). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government : Twitter or Facebook ? https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652

Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda. 900–928. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4040900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4040900

Heimstädt, M. (2017). Openwashing: A decoupling perspective on organizational transparency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037

Hidayah, N. A., Hasanati, N., Putri, R. N., Musa, K. F., Nihayah, Z., & Muin, A. (2020). Analysis Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and DeLone McLean Information System (DM IS) Success Model of AIS Mobile User Acceptance. 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268859

Hilgard, E. R. (1980). THE TRILOGY OF MIND: COGNITION, AFFECTION, AND CONATION. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y

Hudin, J. M., Farlina, Y., Saputra, R. A., Gunawan, A., Pribadi, D., & Riana, D. (2019). Measuring Quality of Information System Through Delone Mclean Model in Online Information System of New Student Registration (SISFO PPDB). 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2018, (Citsm), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674310

Islam, M. T., & Khayer, A. (2021). Exploring continuance usage intention toward open government data technologies : an integrated approach. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2020-0195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2020-0195

Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2014). Data-driven innovation through open government data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200008

Kim, G. H., Trimi, S., & Chung, J. H. (2014). Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2500873

Krismawati, D., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2021). The User Engagement of Open Data Portal. 2021 International Conference Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS53237.2021.9631357

Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ : a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40, 133–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5

Lin, H., & Lee, G. (2005). Effects of socio-technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610641472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610641472

Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Saxena, S., & Singh, P. (2022). Investigation into the adoption of open government data among students : the behavioural intention-based comparative analysis of three countries. 74(3), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0249

Lwoga, E. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 10(1), 4–21. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1669

Montesdioca, G. P. Z., & Macada, A. C. G. (2015). Quality dimensions of the DeLone-McLean model to measure user satisfaction: An empirical test on the information security context. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2015-March, 5010–5019. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.593

Mustapa, M. N., Hamid, S., & Nasaruddin, F. H. (2019). Exploring the Issues of Open Government Data Implementation in Malaysian Public Sectors. (August). https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.8850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.8850

Mustapa, M. N., Md Nasaruddin, F. H., & Hamid, S. (2017). Post-adoption of Open Government Data Initiatives in Public Sectors. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), (Ubaldi 2013), 274.

Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality : An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing Antecedents of Information and System Quality : An Empirical Examination. Management of Information Systems, 21(4), 199–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823

Nugraheni, D. M. K., & Bayastura, S. F. (2021). Analysis of factors that influence satisfaction and usefulness for attendance system with the Delone & McLean model (case study: Attendance system at Diponegoro University). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1943(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1943/1/012108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1943/1/012108

Pardiñan, E. G., Pardiñan, P., & Loremia, R. A. (2019). Simulation-Based Learning in Electronics: Modified TAM and DeLone & McLean IS Success Model. Journal of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 7, 77–93. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/63476623/JSET57420200530-76347-13yppt6.pdf

Piqueiras, P., Canel, M.-J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). Citizen Engagement and Public Sector Communication. The Handbook of Public Sector Communication, (First Edition), 278–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.ch18

Purwanto, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizens ’ Trust in Open Government Data A Quantitative Study about the Effects of Data Quality, System Quality, and Service Quality. The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 310–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396958

Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Component. In American Sociological Review (Vol. 26, pp. 644–645). Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2090276

Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001

Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects, and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012

Salim, M., Alfansi, L., Anggarawati, S., Saputra, F. E., & Afandy, C. (2021). The role of perceived usefulness in moderating the relationship between the Delone and mclean model and user satisfaction. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.4.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.4.002

Sari, N. W. W., Yanuartha, W., Yani, M., & Dewa, S. R. (2021). Evaluation of E-Learning Implementation During the Covid-19 with the DeLone and McLean Models. IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System & Technology), 4(2), 637. https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v4i2.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v4i2.104

Siebers, V., Gradus, R., & Grotens, R. (2018). Citizen engagement and trust : A study among citizen panel members in three Dutch municipalities. The Social Science Journal, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010

Tang, R., & Jiang, J. (2021). Characteristics of Open Government Data ( OGD ) Around the World : A Country-based Comparative. 2020 ASIS&T Asia-Pacific Regional Conference (Virtual Conference), 5(1), 11–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0026

Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, NO.22(22), 61. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en

Umukoro, I. O., & Tiamiyu, M. A. (2022). Modeling the predictors of e-service use among information systems users. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2020-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2020-0018

Urbach, N., & Müller, B. (2012). Chapter 1 The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success. In Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_1

Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Preparation and properties of a carbon-free precast block for ladle lining. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099

Yang, T. M., & Wu, Y. J. (2016). Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies’ open data publication: A study in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.003

Zaied, A. N. H. (2012). An Integrated Success Model for Evaluating Information Systems in Public Sectors. … of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information …, 3(6), 814–825. Retrieved from http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=fulltext&aId=1093381

Zainal, N. Z., Hussin, H., Abd Rahim, N. H., Mior Nazri, M. N., & Suhaimi, M. A. (2019). Open Government Data Use by Malaysians. IEEE 2019 6th International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 1–6.

Zhang, L., Fan, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Effects of Cognitive Factors across different Kinds of Green Products. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154222

Zhao, Y., & Fan, B. (2018). Exploring open government data capacity of government agency: Based on the resource-based theory. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.002

Zhenbin, Y., Kankanhalli, A., Ha, S., & Tayi, G. K. (2019). What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives? an innovation resource perspective. Information & Management, (October 2018), 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103179

Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008

Zhu, W., Yan, R., & Song, Y. (2022). Analyzing the impact of smart city service quality on citizen engagement in a public emergency. Cities, 120(1), 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103439

Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2012). Impediments, challenges, and recommendations for using open government data. 12th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG 2012, 3–5.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Ashahril, S. M., Mat Isa, A., & Anwar, N. (2023). Developing a Framework of Citizen’s Engagement in Open Government Data’s Website. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI12), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI12.5032

Most read articles by the same author(s)