Socio-Technical System as Factors and Influences in Form Design Development

Authors

  • Nor Haliza Johari National Design Centre, Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rusmadiah Anwar National Design Centre, Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nor Nazida Awang Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7.3795

Keywords:

Socio-technical System, Form Development, Design Thinking, Influence Factors

Abstract

Since digitalisation in the cyber-physical system has taken over design development, researchers attempt to improve the approach to new product development including brand recognition. This research attempt to determine the design strategy based on syntactic design meaning in analysing the visual through design formulation, design treatment and design standard inline socio-technical system. The concept of digitalisation design scenario, the methodology was developed by observational study, laboratory study and interview to analyse designer integrates with the strategy of design analysis. The design analysis was approachable to determine the design representation and potentially generalised the characteristic of product design and consumers' psychological preferences toward product forms.

References

Abidin, S. B. Z. (2012). Practice-based design thinking for form development and detailing.

Anwar, R. (2016). Characterising a syntactic pattern of formgiving in design thinking process. PhD Thesis. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam.

Anwar, R., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2015). A pattern in formgiving design: Giving priority to a principle solution in industrial design. In Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015 (pp. 331-340). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Anwar, R., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2015). A practical guideline to quantifying qualitative analyses of design cognition. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 13-21.

Anwar, R., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2015). Understanding methodological solution in design situation of novice designer. In 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 593-597). IEEE.

Anwar, R., Abidin, S. Z., & Hassan, O. H. (2016). In-vitro design protocol: Artificial situation strategy uses to comprehend designers’ thought. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 52, p. 03002). EDP Sciences.

Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with computers, 23(1), 4-17.

Bender, B., Reinicke, T., Wunsche, T., Blessing, L.T.M., 2002, “Applications of methods from social science in design research”, Design 2002, May 14-17.

Cash. P. (2012). Characterising the relationship between practice and laboratory-based studies of designers for critical design situations. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Bath, United Kingdom.

Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design studies, 47, 118-163.

Chakrabarti A (2008) A post graduate course on DRM – A methodology for design research. In: Chakrabarti A, Subrahmanian E (e ds) Indo US Workshop on Design Engineering 2006. Allied Publishing, New Delhi

Chandrasegaran, S. K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R. F., & Gao, W. (2013). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-aided design, 45(2), 204-228.

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter. Constantine, L. L., & Lockwood, L. A. (2001). Structure and style in use cases for user interface design. Object model and user interface design, 245-280.

Gasson, S. (2003). Human-centered vs. user-centered approaches to information system design. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 5(2), 5.

Gretzel, U. (2011). Intelligent systems in tourism: A social science perspective. Annals of tourism research, 38(3), 757-779.

Guchaita, P., Ruetzlerb, T., Taylorb, J., & Toldic, N. (2014). Video interviewing: A potential selection tool for hospitality managers – A study to understand applicant perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 90–100.

Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). CK design theory: an advanced formulation. Research in engineering design, 19(4), 181-192.

Hussin, H., Mansor, S. A., Omar, R., Ismail, H., & Hassan, A. (2009). Seni, Seni Hias, Seni Reka, Reka Bentuk Dan Estetika Daripada Persepsi Umum Dan Orang Melayu. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 20(1), 82-98.

Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121-146.

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational technology research and development, 45(1), 65-94.

Karjalainen, T. M., & Snelders, D. (2010). Designing visual recognition for the brand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 6-22.

Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands (pp. 3-27). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Kimbell, L., & Street, P. E. (2009, September). Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. In CRESC Conference, Manchester (pp. 1-15).

Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. crc Press. Design Helsinki, p. 216.

Meniru K, Rivard H, Bedard C. Specifications for computer-aided conceptual building design. Design Studies 2003;24(1):51–71.

Muller, W. Order and meaning in design. (Lemma Publishers, Utrecht, 2001)

M. Nilsson. “Component Design: A theoretical study of form synthesis, material selection and process selection”, Linkoping, 1998. pp117.

Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). Design judgement: decision-making in the ‘real’world. The Design Journal, 6(1), 23-31.

Noordin, S. N. A., Hassan, O. H., & Anwar, R. (2016). Application of Low-Temperature Transparent Glaze in Sustaining Luminous Grains for Ceramic Artwork Surface Treatment. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium of Art and Design Education Research (i-CADER 2015) (pp. 173-178). Springer, Singapore.

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.

Reshma Saujani, 27 January 2021, From: https://www.qualtrics.com/experience management/brand/customer-based-brand-equity

Rahim, W. N., Anwar, R., Abidin, S. Z., Dass, L. C., & Ujang, B. Role Of DNA Styling: The Creation Of Local Brand Identity Recognition Framework.

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.

Scacchi, W. (2004). Socio-technical design. The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 1, 656-659.

Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Strickler,Z., 1999, “Elicitation methods in experimental design research”, Design Issues, Vol. 15, No. 2, Design Research, pp. 27-39.

Teegavarapu, S., & Summers, J. D. (2008). Case study method for design research. Proceedings of IDETC/DTM, 3-6.

Toldi, N. (2011). Job applicants favor video interviewing in the candidate-selection process. Employment Relations Today, 19–27.

Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., Sun, J. J., & Chuang, A. C. (2016). A review of technology standards and patent portfolios for enabling cyber-physical systems in advanced manufacturing. IEEE Access, 4, 7356-7382.

Warell, A. (2008, October). Modelling perceptual product experience–Towards a cohesive framework of presentation and representation in design. In Design & Emotion 2008; Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design & Emotion, October (pp. 6-9).

Wikipedia, Syantatic structure, 11 January 2021, from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_Structures

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Johari, N. H., Anwar, R., & Awang, N. N. (2022). Socio-Technical System as Factors and Influences in Form Design Development. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7.3795

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>