Integrating Cultural Diversity in Art Education: The Development of Mc-TCIM through Expert Validation
Abstract
This study develops the Multicultural Traditional Craft Interactive Module (Mc-TCIM) as an alternative pedagogical tool to foster culturally responsive teaching in secondary Visual Arts Education. Using the Fuzzy Delphi Technique, expert consensus was obtained on suitable elements, strategies, and content for the module. The findings highlight the inclusion of Malaysian traditional crafts from Sabah, Sarawak, and the Orang Asli, alongside interactive multimedia, to enhance engagement and cater to diverse learning styles. Mc-TCIM provides educators with a framework to integrate multicultural values, promoting cultural sensitivity, collaboration, and appreciation of Malaysia’s heritage.
References
Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826–2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hashim, R., & Nasir, N. (2020). Visual literacy in Malaysian classrooms: A study on the role of visual arts in enhancing learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11080
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2010). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C
Kamarudin, M. F. (2019). Multicultural education in Malaysia: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(1), 1–12.
Kuo, Y. F., & Chen, P. C. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Murray, T. J., Pipino, L. L., & Gigch, J. P. V. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management, 5(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-1985-5108
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
Rahman, N. A., Zainal, Z., & Samad, A. A. (2021). Enhancing students’ engagement through visual-based learning in art education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10319
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rubin, R. S. (2002). Will the real SMART goals please stand up? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 39(4), 26–27.
Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Instrumen penyelidikan pendidikan dan sosial. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akmal Ahamed Kamal, Siti Zuraida Maaruf , Mohd Khairezan Rahmat , Ling Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
