Ecological and Perceptual Factors Shaping Age-Friendly Quality in Rural Public Spaces

Authors

  • Xiangyun Wang Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Alamah Misni Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Bo Zhang School of Art Design, Shandong Youth University of Political Science,250100 Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • Xuan Li Institute of Creative Arts and Design, UCSI University, Cheras 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i36.7814

Keywords:

Age-friendly rural public space, Ecological experience, Spatial perception, PLS-SEM

Abstract

As rural aging intensifies in China, public spaces are increasingly important for older adults’ well-being and social interaction. This study examines how ecological quality shapes age-friendly outcomes through perceptual evaluation and health-related appraisal. Using Dongquan Village as a case, the research combines behavioural observation, 176 valid questionnaires, and PLS-SEM. Results show that better ecological conditions improve perceptual evaluation and health-related appraisal, which together enhance overall satisfaction. Observations further indicate that shaded semi-open spaces and continuous greenery encourage longer stays and everyday interaction. The findings support ecology-oriented improvement of rural public spaces in aging communities.

References

Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Psychology Press.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.41003936

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual review of public health, 35(1), 207–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443

Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational research methods, 17(2), 182–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Lin, T.-P., Matzarakis, A., & Hwang, R.-L. (2010). Shading effect on long-term outdoor thermal comfort. Building and environment, 45(1), 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.002

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.

Organization, W. H. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence, and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(5), e9–e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.064287

Wang, D., Brown, G., & Liu, Y. (2015). The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007

Wang, R., Song, Y., Yang, L., & Browning, M. H. (2024). Neighbourhood green space and loneliness in middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from the WHO Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 95, 128324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128324

Wang, X., & Misni, A. (2026). Exploring the impact of ecological and cultural factors on public spaces: case study on rural public spaces landscape for an age-friendly group in Huangchao Village, Jinan, China. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-026-00704-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-026-00704-w

Wang, X., Misni, A. M., Buyadi, S. N. A., & Sobbri, N. H. (2024). Analysis of particular design methods for aging landscapes in residential areas. Built Environment Journal, 21, 229–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v21iSI.1550

Wilson, G. A. (2008). From ‘weak ‘to ’ strong ’ multifunctionality: Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. Journal of rural studies, 24(3), 367–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010

Xu, L., Han, H., Yang, C., & Liu, Q. (2023). The influence mechanism of the community's subjectively built environment on the physical and mental health of older adults. Sustainability, 15(17), 13211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713211

Xu, T., Nordin, N. A., & Aini, A. M. (2022). Urban green space and subjective well-being of older people: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114227

Yu, J., Zhang, L., & Shi, Q. (2024). Impact of green space on older adults’ quality of life based on spatial and non-spatial analyses. Land, 13(11), 1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111874

Zhang, Y., Luo, H., Xie, J., Meng, X., & Ye, C. (2023). The influence and prediction of the built environment on the subjective well-being of the elderly based on random forest: evidence from Guangzhou, China. Land, 12(10), 1940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101940

Downloads

Published

2026-04-11

How to Cite

Wang, X., Misni, A., Zhang, B., & Li, X. (2026). Ecological and Perceptual Factors Shaping Age-Friendly Quality in Rural Public Spaces. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(36), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i36.7814

Issue

Section

Rural Environment / Rural Psychology

Most read articles by the same author(s)