Epistemological Chirality in Landscape Architecture Pedagogy: A Dual-Method studio at Angkor Wat Temple, Cambodia

Authors

Keywords:

Landscape architecture, Pedagogy, Narrative inquiry, SOPARC

Abstract

This study introduces epistemological chirality, a framework for examining two knowledge systems that are comparable but non-superimposable: a Western-centric quantitative approach and an Indigenous-informed qualitative approach. Eight students in two teams completed 10-minute scans at four selected stations. Group A used modified SOPARC. Group B used narrative inquiry, sensory mapping, and micro-interviews. Analysis using a Chiral Matrix and Chiral Divergence Index (CDI) revealed convergence at ritual nodes, complementarity in transitional and construction spaces, and dissonance where counts suggested activity, but narratives conveyed emptiness. In this setting, divergence presented a pedagogical resource for reflexivity, ethical translation, empathy, and responsive design.

Author Biography

Nappy Navarra, College of Architecture, University of the Philippine Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

Nappy L. Navarra finished his BA Political Science and B in Landscape Architecture from the University of the Philippines Diliman. He completed his Master in Tropical Landscape Architecture degree in the same institution. He proceeded to take his Doctor of Engineering, Major in Environmental Planning and Design from the University of Tokyo. He currently serves as Professor in the College of Architecture, University of the Philippines-Diliman. Aside from handling teaching loads, he is the present Coordinator of the Integrated Graduate Program and the Coordinator of the Environmental Landscapes Studio Laboratory. Aside from his practice in the academe, he is involved in design consultancy and projects in landscape planning and design that aim to create positive impact to the environment and to the community.

References

Avnir, D., & Huylebrouck, D. (2013). On Left and Right: Chirality in Architecture. Nexus Network Journal, 15(1), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-013-0144-x

Barcham, M. (2023). Towards a radically inclusive design – indigenous story-telling as codesign methodology. CoDesign, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1982989

Carmel-Gilfilen, C., & Portillo, M. (2016). Designing With Empathy: Humanizing Narratives for Inspired Healthcare Experiences. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715592633

Danko, S., Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2006). Humanizing Design through Narrative Inquiry. Journal of Interior Design, 31(2), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2005.tb00408.x

Evenson, K. R., Jones, S. A., Holliday, K. M., Cohen, D. A., & McKenzie, T. L. (2016). Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities). Preventive Medicine, 86, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029

Fúnez-Flores, J. I., Beltrán, A. C. D., Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J., Bakshi, S., Laó-Montes, A., & Rios, F. (2025). The Sage Handbook of Decolonial Theory.

Gajendran, T., Tucker, C., Ware, S., & Tose, H. S. (n.d.). Integrating Indigenous, Western and inclusive pedagogies for work-integrated learning partnerships in architecture and design disciplines.

Hussein, A. (2009). The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined?

Jung, J. (2018). Higher education in Korea: Western influences, Asian values and indigenous processes. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1299898

Kovach, M. (2021). Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts, Second Edition.

Leenen-Young, M., Naepi, S., Thomsen, P. S., Fa’avae, D. T. M., Keil, M., & Matapo, J. (2021). ‘Pillars of the colonial institution are like a knowledge prison’: The significance of decolonizing knowledge and pedagogical practice for Pacific early career academics in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(7–8), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928062

McBride, C., Lee, C. H., & Soep, E. (2024). “Gotta Love Some Human Connection”: Humanizing Data Expression in an Age of AI. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(4), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.550

McKenzie, T. L., Cohen, D. A., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., & Golinelli, D. (2006). System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S208–S222. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208

Miole, G. L. (2024). Cultural Interface in Action: A Case Study of Philippine Indigenous Educational Policy. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.3.11

Moffatt, S., White, M., Mackintosh, J., & Howel, D. (2006). Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618]. BMC Health Services Research, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-28

Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2025). Reimagining foundations: Storied-ethnography as a pathway to decolonized design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 25(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00097_1

Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., Surla, K. L., & Edwards, K. T. (2022). “Decolonizing” Curriculum and Pedagogy: A Comparative Review Across Disciplines and Global Higher Education Contexts. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 73–113. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042423

Whyte, W. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. (Original work published The Conservation Foundation)

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Reyes, S., & Navarra, N. (2026). Epistemological Chirality in Landscape Architecture Pedagogy: A Dual-Method studio at Angkor Wat Temple, Cambodia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(38). Retrieved from https://ebpj.e-iph.co.uk/index.php/EBProceedings/article/view/8029