Determinants of Google Workspace Usage and Collaborative Learning among University Students in Selangor

Nur Hafiz Nokhil; Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan; Mohammad Fazli Baharuddin; Abdurrahman Jalil

doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI18.5468

Authors

Nur Hafiz Nokhil College of Computing, Informatics & Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Shamila Mohamed Shuhidan College of Computing, Informatics & Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Mohammad Fazli Baharuddin College of Computing, Informatics & Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Abdurrahman Jalil College of Computing, Informatics & Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40150 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI18.5468

Keywords:

Information Management, Educational Technology, Collaborative Learning

Abstract

Technology for education can assist students' learning goals while opening new avenues for critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity. One of the platforms used by students is Google Workspace, a cloud-based productivity suite developed by Google. However, the problem of insufficient support for sharing content and the unethical use of information system services has become a major concern highlighted in this study. The quantitative findings in this study show a correlation between the usage of Google Workspace and the Collaborative Learning Environment and a recommendation to upskill students with digital literacy skills and ethics of information use.

References

Ahmad, N. A., & Lidadun, B. P. (2017). Enhancing oral presentation skills through video presentation. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 385-397.

Akcil, U., Uzunboylu, H., & Kinik, E. (2021). Integration of Technology to Learning-Teaching Processes and Google Workspace Tools: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(9), 5018.

Anwar, K., Asari, S., Husniah, R., & Asmara, C. H. (2021). Students' Perceptions of Collaborative Team Teaching and Student Achievement Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 325-344.

Asyiqin, N., & Jusmulatif., & Dahnilsyah. (2022). Students' Perceptions of The Use Of Google Classroom On Listening Comprehension Subject At English Study Program Of Universitas Riau. International Journal of Educational Best Practices (IJEBP), 6(2). 213-225. DOI: 10.32851/ijebp. v6n2.p213-225

Atoy Jr, M. B., Garcia, F. R. O., Cadungog, R. R., Cua, J. D. O., Mangunay, S. C., & De Guzman, A. B. (2020). Linking digital literacy and online information searching strategies of Philippine university students: The moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(4), 1015-1027.

Aucott, J. (2022). Why you should be using Google Workspace for Education. Haptic. https://www.haptic-networks.com/google-workspace/why-google-workspace-for-education/

Azhar, K.A. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ perception. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Balkaya, S., & Akkucuk, U. (2021). Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management: Sustainability, 13(3), 1127.

Blasco López, M. F., & Recuero Virto, N. (2020, September). Technological acceptance of Google Drive as an E-learning Tool. In 2020 The 4th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (pp. 1-4).

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Erlbaum.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3).

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282.

Dintoe, S. (2018). Information and communication technology use in higher education: Perspectives from faculty. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(2).

Docrat, R. (2022, August 06). What is Google Workspace for Education? LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-google-workspace-education-ridwaan-docrat

Fedewa, J. (2020). What is Google Workspace, and does it fully replace G Suite. How-To Geek. Retrieved from URL https://www.howtogeek.com/694376/what-is-google-workspaceand-does-it-fully-replace-g-suite/

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2015). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., Yee, A., & Chong, L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

Hussaini, I., Ibrahim, S., Wali, B., Libata, I., & Musa, U. (2020). Effectiveness of Google Classroom as a Digital Tool in Teaching and Learning: 'Students' Perceptions. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 4(4), 51-54. https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtuallibrary/papers/effectiveness-of-google-classroom-as-a-digital-tool-in-teachingand-learning-students-perceptions/

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford Publications.

Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Ziyae, B. (2016). Presenting an evaluation model of human resource management’s effect on corporate entrepreneurship. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 228–242.