Environmental Awareness and Perceived Responsibility Regarding Generative AI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i37.7965

Keywords:

Generative AI, Sustainable AI, LLMs, AI Environmental Impact

Abstract

In recent years, Generative AI (GenAI) has become an integral part of student life. The growing use of GenAI demands substantial resources, such as electricity and rare earth metals. This study aims to identify the primary use case for GenAI among undergraduate students at Kyungdong University Global, as well as their awareness of its environmental impact and perceived responsibility. We examined the interconnections between usage frequency, awareness, responsibility attitude, and readiness to reduce AI use. The analysis showed that the students who use GenAI frequently are more aware of its environmental impact but find it hard to stop using it.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Balakrishnan, S., Chittineni, J., Maheswari, P., & Sahila, C. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Green Choices: Exploring environmental attitudes and digital behaviour in India. Journal of Research Innovation and Technologies (JoRIT), 4(16), 159. https://doi.org/10.57017/jorit.v4.2(8).03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57017/jorit.v4.2(8).03

Colombo, S. L., Chiarella, S. G., Lefrançois, C., Fradin, J., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2023). Why Knowing about Climate Change Is Not Enough to Change: A Perspective Paper on the Factors Explaining the Environmental Knowledge-Action Gap. Sustainability, 15(20), 14859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014859

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Desislavov, R., Martínez-Plumed, F., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2021). Compute and energy consumption trends in deep learning inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05472.

Dungo, C. a. B., Beltran, Z. L. E., Declaro, B. C., Dela-Cruz, J. J. C., & Viray, R. U. (2025). Students' level of awareness on the environmental implications of generative AI. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 11(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.777

Festinger, L. (1972). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Social psychology: Experimentation, theory, research, 254-257.

Gibbons, S., Watts, C., White, S., & Bach, L. (2025). Investigating awareness and behavioural intentions from AI water footprint digital posters in higher education settings. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101533

Hochachka, G. (2024). When concern is not enough: Overcoming the climate awareness-action gap. AMBIO, 53(8), 1182–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-01999-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-01999-5

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Luccioni, S., Jernite, Y., & Strubell, E. (2024, June). Power hungry processing: Watts driving the cost of AI deployment?. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 85-99). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542

Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L. M., Rothchild, D., ... & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.

Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., ... & Bengio, Y. (2022). Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(2), 1-96.d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3485128

Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green ai. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3381831

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 81-97.

Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019, July). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 3645-3650). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355

Van Wynsberghe, A. (2021). Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00043-6

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., ... & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature communications, 11(1), 233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X., & Yu, T. (2024). Factors influencing university students' behavioral intention to use generative artificial intelligence: integrating the theory of planned behavior and AI literacy. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6649–6671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033

Yan, G., Zhu, C., Li, T., Yip, J., & Ni, J. (2026). Assessing the impact of generative AI on undergraduate thesis quality: A comparative study of students and teachers. PLoS ONE, 21(4), e0347653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347653

Zhang, K., Bhandari, K. S., & Cho, G. (2023). TB-RPL: A try-the-best fused mode of operation to enhance point-to-point communication performance in RPL. Electronics, 12(7), 1639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071639

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Rai, S., Bhandari, K., & Al-Absi, A. (2026). Environmental Awareness and Perceived Responsibility Regarding Generative AI. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(37), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i37.7965