Librarian’s Conscience Framework: Human Oversight and Accountability in AI-Supported Academic Library Work

Authors

  • Haziah Sa'ari Faculty of Information Science UiTM Kampus Rembau, Negeri Sembilan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-3755
  • Norhashimah Hashim Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Perdana, Malaysia
  • Stan Skrzeszewsk Museum and Archives of the Polish Armed Forces, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i38.8107

Abstract

AI-supported library work creates risks involving accuracy, privacy, fairness, metadata, and access. This conceptual study synthesizes 38 Scopus- and Web of Science-indexed studies to develop the Librarian’s Conscience Framework. Librarian conscience refers to the capacity to apply shared professional duties across service contexts, justify interventions, and escalate decisions beyond individual authority. The framework integrates professional ethics, human oversight, humanistic values, and spiritual commitments through three dimensions: professional judgment, ethical responsibility, and accountability. Five actions guide output verification, privacy judgment, fairness assessment, metadata responsibility, and accountable mediation, producing reliable information, protected inquiry, fair access, accurate metadata, and defensible decisions in practice.

 

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

Sa’ari, H., Hashim, N., & Skrzeszewsk, S. (2026). Librarian’s Conscience Framework: Human Oversight and Accountability in AI-Supported Academic Library Work. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(38). https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v11i38.8107

Issue

Section

Track 1: Smart Technology & Digital Behavioral Environments